Corporate social performance, financial performance and institutional ownership in Canadian firms

By Lois S. Mahoney, Robin W. Roberts. 2007

383 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd7f0806204c190afd63def50d8f51cc530560f3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Lammertjan Dam
2. M. Asutay
3. E. Platonova
4. Sabri Mohammad
5. Rob Dixon
6. Claude Francoeur
7. R. Makni
8. Duchi Liu

In Marketing

1. Lammertjan Dam
2. Claude Francoeur
3. R. Makni
4. Duchi Liu
5. E. Platonova
6. Ester Gras-Gil
7. Sabri Mohammad
8. Rob Dixon

In Strategy and Management

1. Lammertjan Dam
2. Bert Scholtens
3. Duchi Liu
4. Jian-bai Huang
5. M. Asutay
6. E. Platonova
7. Sabri Mohammad
8. Rob Dixon

Citations in the corpus

• The Relationship of CSR and Financial Performance: New Evidence from Indonesian Companies (2009, neutral): “Mahoney and Roberts (2007) followed the approach of Waddock and Grave (2007) using the index data of CSP issued by MJRA.”
• Corporate social responsibility disclosure and its relation on institutional ownership: Evidence from public listed companies in Malaysia (2010, background): “Empirical testing by Mahoney and Roberts (2007) and Teoh and Shiu (1990) reveal that the product dimension of CSR relates to shares owned by IO.”
• Investigating the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: Evidence from Spain (2016, methodology): “CSR research has employed a variety of theories and ethodologies to study the potential relationship between SR activities and other traditional measures of a firm’s uccess (Mahoney and Roberts, 2007, p. 234).”
• The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Financial Performance: Evidence from the GCC Islamic Banking Sector (2018, background): “Turning to the individual measures of CSR, Mahoney and Roberts (2007) reported that the measures for the environment and international activities in the CSR construct sig-nificantly affect financial performance.”
• Causality Between Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence from Canadian Firms (2009, methodology): “According to Mahoney and Roberts (2007) but contrary to Waddock and Graves (1997) our results suggest no significant relationship between the aggregated CSP score and FP, except for market returns.”
• Corporate social responsibility, the cost of equity capital and ownership structure: An analysis of Chinese listed firms (2015, background): “An increasing number of studies attempt to answer this question by concentrating on the ties between CSR and financial performance (Galbreath and Shum, 2012; Mahoney and Roberts, 2007; Perrini et al., 2011; Renneboog et al., 2008; Servaes and Tamayo, 2013).”
• Looking for evidence of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in an emerging market (2011, background): “A high level of involvement in CSR practices does not only improve the financial performance of companies, it also attracts a positive response from institutional investors (Mahoney and Roberts, 2007).”
• The Impact of Integrated Practices of Lean, Green, and Social Management Systems on Firm Sustainability Performance—Evidence from Chinese Fashion Auto-Parts Suppliers (2015, background): “While other researchers such as Mahoney and Robers [20] and Parast and Adams [50] found no significant relations between the two, Saeidi et al.”
• “Triple Bottom Line” as “Sustainable Corporate Performance”: A Proposition for the Future (2010, methodology): “The Mahoney and Robert’s modified measures of social performance are shown in the Table 4.”