Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report.
By B. Cuthbert, Harald T. Schupp, Margaret M. Bradley, Niels Birbaumer, Peter J. Lang. Biological Psychology, 2000
1,862 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd429f6813370825aba5ad2573eb1026372693e7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Greg Hajcak
- Peter J. Lang
- Margaret M. Bradley
- Markus Junghöfer
- Harald T. Schupp
- Jessica Stockburger
- Annmarie MacNamara
- Doreen M. Olvet
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Greg Hajcak
- Peter J. Lang
- Margaret M. Bradley
- Manuel G. Calvo
- Harald T. Schupp
- Dan Foti
- Robert F. Simons
- Markus Junghöfer
Citations in the corpus
- Emotional facial expressions evoke faster orienting responses, but weaker emotional responses at neural and behavioural levels compared to scenes: A simultaneous EEG and facial EMG study (2016, positive): “…arousal must be taken into consideration, because stimuli that evoke heightened arousal have been shown tomodulate both neural and facial muscle activity independent of emotional valence or stimulus type (Cacioppo et al., 1986; Cuthbert et al., 2000; Feng et al., 2014; Lang et al., 1993).”
- Emotional Facilitation of Sensory Processing in the Visual Cortex (2003, methodology): “That is, as found previously (Cuthbert et al., 2000; Schupp, Cuthbert, et al., 2000), the amplitudes of the centro-parietal LPP were augmented for affective images relative to neutral pictures.”
- The selective processing of briefly presented affective pictures: an ERP analysis. (2004, background): “A number of recent ERP studies explored emotional picture processing by presenting pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant pictures from the International Affective Picture Series (IAPS; Cuthbert et al., 2000; Keil et al., 2002; Schupp et al., 2000, 2003a; Schupp, Cuthbert, et al., in press).”
- Gaze Patterns When Looking at Emotional Pictures: Motivationally Biased Attention (2004, methodology): “, pleasant versus unpleasant versus neutral (e.g., Bradley et al., 1996; Christianson et al., 1991; Cuthbert et al., 2000; Lang et al., 1993; Tipples, Atkinson, et al., 2002).”
- Emotion and attention: event-related brain potential studies. (2006, background): “2, subsequent to the modulation during perceptual encoding, it is consistently observed that emotional (pleasant and unpleasant) pictures elicit increased late positive potentials (LPPs) over centro-parietal regions, most apparent around 400–600ms poststimulus (also referred to as P3b; Palomba et al”
- Event-related potentials to schematic faces in social phobia (2007, background): “The N170 has been linked to late stages of structural encoding in which representations of global face configurations are generated for subsequent face-recognition processes (Eimer, 2000).”
- A Review on the Computational Methods for Emotional State Estimation from the Human EEG (2013, methodology): “Basically, the computation of ERPs requires averaging EEG signals over multiple trials, rendering ERP features inappropriate for online computing.”
- Merely Being with you Increases My Attention to Luxury Products: Using EEG to Understand Consumers’ Emotional Experience with Luxury Branded Products (2015, methodology): “The LPP is a long-lasting, positive slow wave and is maximal over centroparietal sites, peaking around 500–700 ms after stimulus onset (Cuthbert et al. 2000; Hajcak, MacNamara, and Olvet 2010; Münte et al. 2000; Olofsson et al. 2008).”
- Repetition and Event-related Potentials: Distinguishing Early and Late Processes in Affective Picture Perception (2007, background): “Event-related potentials (ERPs) measured during affective picture viewing consistently vary with emotional arousal, with affective pictures (either pleasant or unpleasant) eliciting a larger, late positive potential (LPP) from about 300–600 msec over the centroparietal cortex (Schupp, Junghofer, Wei”
- Reappraisal modulates the electrocortical response to unpleasant pictures (2006, positive): “Furthermore, the CPz maximum of the LPP is consistent with the scalp topography of this component in several previous studies (Cuthbert et al., 2000; Keil et al., 2002; Schupp et al., 2000; Schupp et al., 2003).”
- Emotional processing and emotional memory are modulated by interoceptive awareness (2008, background): “Viewing affective pictures is accompanied by heart-rate decelera- tion, which is modulated by affective content and emotional arousal (e.g., Bradley, Codispoti, Cuthbert, & Lang, 2001; Cuthbert et al., 2000; Lang, Greenwald, Bradley, & Hamm, 1993; Prkachin, Williams-Avery, Zwaal, & Mills, 1999).”
- Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. (2008, methodology): “However, standard ERP recording methods find that the P2 component and adjacent N2 component are sensitive to the onset of pleasant-going arousal-related amplitude modulation that persists until stimulus offset (Amrhein et al., 2004; Carretie et al., 2001a, 2001b, 2004; Cuthbert et al., 2000; Olofss”