The selective processing of briefly presented affective pictures: an ERP analysis.

By Harald T. Schupp, Markus Junghöfer, A. Weike, Alfons O. Hamm. Psychophysiology, 2004

703 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88dfd28afe472af7f7b37e704fc423130fc14efd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Event-Related Potentials, Emotion, and Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review (2010, background): “For instance, Schupp and colleagues presented visual stimuli for 120 to 333 msec and found an increased LPP up to 300 msec after picture offset (Schupp et al., 2004a; Schupp et al., 2007).”
Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. (2008, methodology): “The main theoretical interpretation of the EPN is that it indexes “natural selective attention,” such that evaluation of image features is guided by perceptual qualities that select affectively arousing stimuli for further processing (Dolcos and Cabeza, 2002; Schupp et al., 2004).”
Event-related potentials to schematic faces in social phobia (2007, background): “In the earlier studies (Eimer & Holmes, 2002; Holmes et al., 2003; Schupp et al., 2004b), the detection of the facial emotion was not explicitly task relevant.”
Repetition and Event-related Potentials: Distinguishing Early and Late Processes in Affective Picture Perception (2007, background): “This earlier component sometimes differs only for pleasant pictures, or is most pronounced for pleasant pictures (De Cesarei & Codispoti, 2006; Schupp et al., 2004; Keil et al., 2002).”
Emotion and attention: event-related brain potential studies. (2006, methodology): “For instance, focusing on the fear system, we re cently obtained evidence that threatening faces are associated with increased EPN and LPP amplitudes compared to neutral and friendly faces (Schupp et al., 2004c). experience.”
Deconstructing Reappraisal: Descriptions Preceding Arousing Pictures Modulate the Subsequent Neural Response (2008, result): “…early window, presented in Figure 4 (top): Both differences revealed a positive difference that was maximal at posterior-superior recording sites, as has been consistently found in other LPP studies (Hajcak & Nieuwenhuis, 2006; Moser et al., 2006; Schupp et al., 2000, 2004; Cuthbert et al., 2000).”
Emotional facial expressions evoke faster orienting responses, but weaker emotional responses at neural and behavioural levels compared to scenes: A simultaneous EEG and facial EMG study (2016, positive): “…compared to neutral (Leppänen et al., 2008; Stekelenburg and de Gelder, 2004) and happy expressions (Herbert et al., 2013b; Mühlberger et al., 2009; Schupp et al., 2004b), and enhanced EPN negativity for positive scenes compared to negative and neutral scenes (Bublatzky and Schupp, 2011; Franken…”