Repetition and Event-related Potentials: Distinguishing Early and Late Processes in Affective Picture Perception

299 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. (2008, methodology): “…neg, figure-ground vs complex scenes T: 150-250: largest effect of composition at fronto-occipital sites; 400-700: parietal locus of arousal effect Codispoti et al. (2007) F/M: 12/12 A: 21-28 C: High-arousing neg/ pos, low-arousing neu [1000] B: IAPS normative data F: Habituation of early and…”
A Review on the Computational Methods for Emotional State Estimation from the Human EEG (2013, background): “The ERP components of short to middle latencies have been shown to correlate with valence [34–37], whereas with the ERP components of middle to long latencies have been shown to correlate with arousal [38–41].”
Event-Related Potentials, Emotion, and Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review (2010, methodology): “…many other measures that are sensitive to emotional compared to neutral stimuli, including skin conductance, heart rate, facial electromyography (EMG), and amygdala activation measured using fMRI, habituate (Breiter et al., 1996; Codispoti & De Cesarei, 2007; Codispoti et al., 2006, 2007).”
Emotion and the motivational brain (2009, background): “As previously discussed, research has shown that modulation of the late positive potential by emotion is highly stable over repeated trials, even when the same picture is presented multiple times (e.g., Codispoti et al., 2007).”