Latent Inhibition and Openness to Experience in a high-achieving student population

By Jordan B. Peterson, S. Carson. 2000

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd24e5bc3897b022212cb5b67e299fa80b907444

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? (2002, unknown): “(Nietzsche, 1886/1966a, p. 26).”
Opening up Openness to Experience: A Four-Factor Model and Relations to Creative Achievement in the Arts and Sciences. (2013, background): “While both Peterson, Smith, and Carson (2002) and Peterson and Carson (2000) found a significant relationship between reduced latent inhibition (Lubow, 1989; Lubow & Weiner, 2009) and openness to experience, Kaufman (2009a,b) found that reduced latent inhibition was only significantly correlated…”
Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire (2005, methodology): “R subtests as part of another unrelated study (Peterson & Carson, 2000).”
Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: replication and commentary (2002, methodology): “…in LI are also associated with heightened levels of the two big five traits Openness (from the NEO-FFI; Costa & McCrae, 1992) and Extraversion (from the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire; Eysenck, S.B.G., Eysenck, H.J & Barrett, 1985), in a high-achieving student sample (Peterson & Carson, 2000).”
FEATURED ARTICLE: The Creative Process in Picasso's Guernica Sketches: Monotonic Improvements versus Nonmonotonic Variants (2007, unknown): “Creative individuals also score lower on indicators of negative priming and latent inhibition, meaning that they are less prone to filter out supposedly extraneous information (Ansberg & Hill, 2003; Carson, Peterson, & Higgins, 2003; Eysenck, 1993; Peterson & Carson, 2000).”
Taking the U.S. Patent Office Criteria Seriously: A Quantitative Three-Criterion Creativity Definition and Its Implications (2012, background): “Also telling is the tendency for creativity to be linked with defocused attention, reduced latent inhibition, or some comparable relaxing of the cognitive filters (Ansburg & Hill, 2003; Eysenck, 1995; Mendelsohn, 1976; Peterson & Carson, 2000; Peterson, Smith, & Carson, 2002).”
Factors Influencing Individual Creativity in the Workplace: An Examination of Quantitative Empirical Research (2005, result): “The relationship among creativity, openness to experience, and divergent thinking was supported in several other studies as well (Carson et al., 2003; Peterson & Carson, 2000).”
The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence (2010, background): “Examples for which positive effects on creativity have been found include intrinsic motivation (e.g., Amabile, 1983), positive moods (e.g., Ashby et al., 1999; Baas et al., 2008), approach motor actions and promotion focus (Friedman & Förster, 2000, 2001, 2002), romantic motives (Griskevicius et al”
Creativity and Discovery as Blind Variation: Campbell's (1960) BVSR Model after the Half-Century Mark (2011, background): “…(Eysenck, 1995; Kasof, 1997; Mendelsohn, 1976; cf. Zabelina & Robinson, 2010), and this correlation has received additional support from more recent research on the relation between creativity and reduced latent inhibition (Carson, Peterson, & Higgins, 2003; Peterson & Carson, 2000; Kéri, 2011).”