Causal Reasoning in Rats
By A. Blaisdell, K. Sawa, Kenneth J. Leising, Michael R. Waldmann. 2006
280 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Tamara van Gog
- J. V. van Merriënboer
- Eörs Szathmáry
- Matthew Botvinick
- Thomas Bugnyar
- Zeb Kurth-Nelson
- Peter W. Battaglia
- Chrisantha Fernando
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Tamara van Gog
- John Sweller
- Fred Paas
- J. V. van Merriënboer
- Liesbeth Kester
- Linda Bol
- Douglas J. Hacker
- Matt C. Keener
In Social Psychology
- Thomas Bugnyar
- Christian Rutz
- J. V. van Merriënboer
- Alex Kacelnik
- Alex A. S. Weir
- Chrisantha Fernando
- Pedro A. Ortega
- Silvio Savarese
Citations in the corpus
- Causal Reasoning from Meta-reinforcement Learning (2019, background): “Causal reasoning may be an essential component of natural ∗ Corresponding author: ishitadasgupta@g.harvard.edu intelligence and is present in human babies, rats, and even birds (Leslie, 1982; Gopnik et al., 2001; 2004; Blaisdell et al., 2006; Lagnado et al., 2013).”
- Causal reasoning in a prediction task with hidden causes (2015, background): “Indeed, the processing of causal information appears to be deeply embedded in animal cognition (Sloman, 2005; Blaisdell et al., 2006); and studies in child development have shown that we learn to form and rely on causal knowledge early on in our lives (Gopnik et al., 2004; Meltzoff, 2007).”
- Tool-related Cognition in New Caledonian Crows (2006, background): “This has led to a technical debate about the mathematical properties of associative learning and what behaviours it can and cannot explain (e.g., Dickinson, 200�) and whether other algorithms such as causal Bayes nets provide a better explanation (e.g., Blaisdell, Sawa, Leising, & Waldmann, 2006 ).”
- Causal Learning (2012, methodology): “Intervention Versus Observation Following analogous work on humans (Waldmann & Hagmayer, 2005), Blaisdell et al. (2006) reported a result that challenges associative models: Rats are capable of distinguishing between observations and interventions.”
- Copying and Evolution of Neuronal Topology (2008, background): “Considerable attention has been paid recently to the capacity of animals such as New Caledonian crows [90], rats [91], non-human apes [ 91 ], children [92] and human adults [92] to undertake causal reasoning tasks, i.e.”
- Neural Implementation of Hierarchical Bayesian Inference by Importance Sampling (2009, background): “Studies of human psychophysics and animal behavior suggest that the brain is capable of solving these problems in a way that is consistent with optimal Bayesian statistical inference [1, 2, 3, 4].”
- Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds (2008, unknown): “Nonhuman animals also appear to be implicitly sensitive to the differences between certain basic causal structures (see Blaisdell et al. 2006).”
- Causal Induction from Visual Observations for Goal Directed Tasks (2019, background): “The capacity to reason about cause and effect has been observed in humans and other intelligent animals as a means of survival (Blaisdell et al., 2006; Taylor et al., 2008).”
- Causal learning in rats and humans: A minimal rational model (2008, methodology): “We will now revisit the results of Blaisdell et al. (2006) discussing them in greater detail in the context of the three models.”