Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future

By D. Beaver. Scientometrics, 2001

543 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks (2011, background): “…studied graphically, but rather as a social phenomenon with different factors, including economic factors (Price, 1966), intra-scientific factors (Beaver, 2001), scientific acknowledgement factors (Cronin, Shaw, & La Barre, 2003; Giles & Councill, 2004), organizational factors (Glanzel &…”
Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital (2004, background): “…the most commonly cited reasons for research collaboration include access to expertise (Katz and Martin, 1997; Melin, 2000; Thorsteinsdottir, 2000; Beaver, 2001), access to equipment or resources one does not have (Meadows and O’Connor, 1971; Meadows, 1974; Melin, 2000; Thorsteinsdottir, 2000;…”
Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century - A review (2008, background): “Frandsen, Rousseau, and Rowlands (2006) further extended these ideas. Lewison, Rippon, and Wooding (2005) also study citation diffusion, although from a different perspective – they consider several citation generations.”
International Scientist Mobility and the Locus of Knowledge and Technology Transfer (2011, background): “Moreover, scientists eek to collaborate with industry in order to get access to research rants as they have become a major source of university research unding (Beaver, 2001; Hall et al., 2003; Bozeman and Corley, 2004).”