When Is Foreignness an Asset or a Liability? Explaining the Performance Differential Between Foreign and Local Firms

By Lilach Nachum. 2010

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5de61a8e8867441b71542fa40133462e2a638813

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Ernesto Freitas
2. J. Mata

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Ernesto Freitas
2. J. Mata
3. Alex Coad
4. Blaise Melly
5. Richard E. Baldwin
6. Christoph Rothe
7. David H. Autor
8. R. Baptista

In Strategy and Management

1. Ernesto Freitas
2. J. Mata

Citations in the corpus

• Foreignness and exit over the life cycle of firms (2012, background): “More generally, Nachum (2010) attempted to identify and measure the sources of advantages and disadvantages, and found that while, on average, foreign and domestic firms were not significantly different on the costs dimension, foreign firms possessed advantages relative to the purely local firms,…”
• Audience Heterogeneity and the Effectiveness of Market Signals: How to Overcome Liabilities of Foreignness in Film Exports? (2014, unknown): “3 Foreignness is not always is a liability, especially when audiences are familiar with foreign products (Knight, Holdsworth, & Mather, 2007), and it can even be an asset (Nachum, 2003, 2010; Newburry, Gardberg, & Belkin, 2006).”