Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge
By G. Lakomski. 2004
283 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc02bd49f9aaf979787967cd40994044e551739a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Network Interventions (2012, background): “People often view themselves as members of a community of practice (23) with established norms and processes that can only change when the whole group changes (24).”
- Understanding Sports Coaching: The Social, Cultural and Pedagogical Foundations of Coaching Practice (2004, background): “Further, the coach can utilize activities (within the same category) that are not specific to the sport he or she is coaching to develop tactics rather than only focusing on sport-specific techniques (Werner et al. 1996).”
- Communities of practice as stimulating forces for collective learning (2006, background): “According to Wenger et al. (2002), these elements, when functioning well together, make a CoP an ideal knowledge structure – a social structure that can assume responsibility for developing and sharing knowledge.”
- What it means is what it does: a comparative analysis of implementing intellectual capital in Norway and Spain (2003, background): “…by specific pedagogical management tools, such as learning-on-the-job, mentoring, debriefing, value building, team work and group reporting – all promoting the practice of understanding and focusing on communication and learning (Yeung et al., 1999; Wenger et al., 2002; Manville and Ober, 2003).”
- Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context (2013, background): “IMkw is aroused when individuals feel that learning is associated with interactions and connections with coworkers, providing them with a sense of belongingness and satisfying their need for relatedness (Lee et al. 2005, Wegner et al. 2002).”