Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects
By A. Shenton. Education for Information, 2004
10,085 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cbe670d35e449ceed731466c316cd273032b28ca
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Sociology and Political Science
- Timothy Hyungsoo Jung
- Namho Chung
- L. E. Zayas
- A. Doyon
- Greg Owens
- Donna Adkins
- Ingle M. Larkin
- F. Kalu
Citations in the corpus
- Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, and Turnover Intention of Online Teachers in the K-12 Setting (2016, positive): “Additionally, the researcher kept a journal of reflective commentary to evaluate and document the effectiveness of techniques, impressions of each data collection, and emerging patterns in the data (Shenton, 2004).”
- A case study in public child welfare: county-level practices that address racial disparity in foster care placement (2019, positive): “In addition, triangulation consists of involving a wide range of study participants so that varying viewpoints are offered and that information can be verified against each other (Shenton, 2004).”
- Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS (2016, result): “Although it may appear to some people that the ratings could be slightly subjective, the provision of reviews from a wide range of informants, particularly concerning the first-ranked MOOC, serves as a form of data triangulation (Shenton, 2004) to provide evidence that the first-ranked course is ind”
- Developmental relationships and school success: How teachers, parents, and friends affect educational outcomes and what actions students say matter most (2020, methodology): “Researchers analyzing the data also kept ongoing reflective memos to monitor emerging patterns in the data (Charmaz, 2008; Shenton, 2004.)”
- A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research (2019, methodology): “Transferability is communicated, in part, through description of sampling factors such as: geographical location of the study, number and characteristics of participants, and the timeframe of data collection and analysis.(40) Such descriptions also contribute to the credibility of the results and re”
- Evaluating Qualitative Research for Social Work Practitioners (2010, background): “checking can involve including selected research participants in the data analysis or returning to a sample of participants with a draft of the findings to ascertain their sense of agreement with the findings (Shenton, 2004).”
- Combatting Challenges to Establishing Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research (2015, background): “In a similar vein, Shenton (2004) articulates the technique as “. . . when appropriate participants may be asked if they can offer particular patterns observed by the researcher” (p. 68).”
- Ensuring Rigor in Qualitative Data Analysis (2018, positive): “Adherence to this framework by adopting strategies, such as those outlined, to address the individual criteria supports a rigorous research process (Holloway, 2008; Korstjens & Moser, 2017; Shenton, 2004).”
- Disability in higher education – do reasonable adjustments contribute to an inclusive curriculum? (2020, methodology): “In order to assure credibility throughout the study, the line of questions were based on existing comparable empirical studies that focused on disability, and the inclusive curriculum (Shenton 2004).”
- #BlackGirlMagic: The identity conceptualization of Black women in undergraduate STEM education (2018, background): “Transferability, the ability of someone to make an informed judgment on similarities between the research context and other environments (Guba, 1981; Shenton, 2004), was satisfied by providing thick descriptions of the research contexts and in the research findings, and by investigating the…”
- Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. (2016, background): “(Shenton 2004.)”