Combatting Challenges to Establishing Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research

434 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Elite Female Athletes’ Perceptions of New Media Use Relating to Their Careers: A Qualitative Analysis (2017, background): “Although researchers attempt to be as objective as possible during data analysis, each researcher brings his or her own personal experiences and biases to the impacting the interpretation of data (Kornbluh, 2015).”
Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research? (2017, background): “(Koelsch 2013, p. 169) An often-stated purpose for using member checks is the correction of bias or misinterpretations made by researchers and ensuring accuracy and authenticity in representing participants’ experiences (Fossey et al. 2002; Kornbluh 2015).”
Sink or swim: Adversity- and growth-related experiences in Olympic swimming champions (2015, result): “Further to this and in line with 293 recommended member-checking procedures (cf. Carlson, 2010; Creswell, 2009; Kornbluh, 2015), 294 a copy of the manuscript was later (i.e., after the analysis of the data and the authors’ 295 interpretation of the findings) sent to the participants inviting them…”
Soft Skills Needed for the 21st-Century Workforce (2019, background): “Member checking is a measure to mitigate bias (Kornbluh, 2015; Peeraer & Stalmeijer, 2014; Van Schaik, O’Brien, Almeida, & Adler, 2014).”