Collective Guilt: The Evocation of Moral Emotions in Intergroup Contexts: The Distinction Between Collective Guilt and Collective Shame

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Group-Based Shame and Guilt: Emerging Directions in Research (2011, unknown): “Our work (e.g., Iyer et al., 2007; Johns et al., 2005; Lickel et al., 2004, 2005, 2007; Scarnier et al., 2009; Schmader & Lickel, 2006a,b) has been particularly focused on identifying the differences between group-based shame and guilt.”
Ashamed to be an American? The role of identification in predicting vicarious shame for anti-Arab prejudice after 9–11 (2005, background): “However, Lickel and Schmader (Lickel, Schmader, Curtis, Ames, & Barquissau, in press; Lickel et al., 2004) have recently examined when and why people might feel ashamed as a result of someone else’s morally questionable behavior.”
Seeing Through Their Eyes: When Majority Group Members Take Collective Action on Behalf of an Outgroup (2008, background): “For example, groupbased shame may manifest in distancing from ingroup members who caused the events or distancing from situations that remind people of the inequality (Lickel et al., 2004).”
Cross-Domain Effects of Guilt on Desire for Self-Improvement Products (2015, background): “…behavior (i.e., I did something wrong), whereas those experiencing shame undergo a more global negative attribution and perceive the self as the central object of negative evaluation (i.e., I am a bad person; Lewis 1971; Lewis 2010; Lickel, Schmader, and Barquissau 2004; Tangney and Dearing 2002).”