Ashamed to be an American? The role of identification in predicting vicarious shame for anti-Arab prejudice after 9–11
By Michael Johns, T. Schmader, Brian Lickel. 2005
138 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65fa0338a07fc913b038d927d384e2e0d6ad8856
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- C. Leach
- A. Iyer
- Winnifred R. Louis
- T. Schmader
- Brian Lickel
- Rupert Brown
- F. Barlow
- Jesse A. Allpress
In Sociology and Political Science
- C. Leach
- A. Iyer
- Winnifred R. Louis
- T. Schmader
- Brian Lickel
- Rupert Brown
- F. Barlow
- Jesse A. Allpress
Citations in the corpus
- Moral emotions and moral behavior. (2007, unknown): “…2003, Lickel et al 2005, Swim & And as with personal shame experiences, vicarious group-based shame (but not guilt) has been linked to a desire to distance oneself link between anger and shame is evident when considering vicarious shame (Iyer et al. 2006, Johns et al. 2005, Schmader & Lickel 2006).”
- Group-Based Shame and Guilt: Emerging Directions in Research (2011, unknown): “We observed a similar pattern in Americans’ feelings of shame for incidents of anti-Arab prejudice after 9-11 (Johns et al., 2005).”
- The Approach and Avoidance Function of Guilt and Shame Emotions: Comparing Reactions to Self-Caused and Other-Caused Wrongdoing (2006, background): “We have observed shame of this type from Americans in response to prejudice ( Johns, Schmader, & Lickel, 2005 ), British citizens in response to the Iraq war (Iyer, Schmader, & Lickel, 2006), and Hispanics in response to stereotypic ingroup members (Schmader & Lickel, 2006).”
- Vicarious Shame and Guilt (2005, unknown): “Johns, Schmader, & Lickel, in press; Schmader & Lickel, in press).”
- Emotion in inter-group relations (2008, background): “Similarly, Johns et al. (2005) did not find in-group identification and the negativity of the mistreatment of the out-group to interact to determine guilt (once shame was accounted for).”
- Atoning for Colonial Injustices: Group-Based Shame and Guilt Motivate Support for Reparation (2010, result): “In line with research on interpersonal shame, a small number of studies have found an association between shame and distancing motivations (Iyer et al. 2007; Johns et al. 2005; Lickel et al. 2006; Schmader and Lickel 2006).”