Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour

1,408 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments (2018, background): “Even interventions that successfully change beliefs about the health consequences of behaviors often fail to lead tomeaningful behavioral changes (Carpenter 2010, Sniehotta et al. 2014).”
Factors influencing consumer acceptance of vehicle-to-grid by electric vehicle drivers in the Netherlands (2021, background): “The model has limited predictive validity (it is difficult to predict a complex phenomenon such as V2G acceptance with high accuracy based on a relatively small number of variables or static preferences) (Sniehotta et al., 2014).”
Toward a theory of behavioral control (2021, background): “…purpose, and predictive validity of the theory of planned behavior and other reasoned action theories with respect to the concerns raised by critics through rejoinders in the existing literature (see Ajzen, 2015; Ajzen & Schmidt, 2020; Conner, 2015, 2020; Lim, 2018; Sniehotta et al., 2014).”
The theory of planned behaviour is alive and well, and not ready to retire: a commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau, and Araújo-Soares (2015, background): “In their editorial, Sniehotta et al. (2014) point to the review by Hardeman et al. (2002) as showing lack of support for the effectiveness of behaviour change interventions based on the TPB.”