Is student evaluation of teaching worthwhile? An analytical framework for answering the question

By J. Pounder. 2007

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cae4099a1f15a7b632bfbc644d8414d491fced6c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

A Study on Student Satisfaction in Pakistani Universities: The Case of Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan (2011, methodology): “Student evaluation of teaching (SET) is among the most frequently used performance measurement instruments used by higher education institutions across the world (Pounder, 2007; Stratton, 1990).”
Examining student satisfaction with higher education services: using a new measurement tool (2010, background): “On module-level, student evaluation of teaching (SET) questionnaires are quite common and Pounder (2007)”
Higher education in the United Arab Emirates: an analysis of the outcomes of significant increases in supply and competition (2010, background): “Pounder (2007) suggests that educational institutions should develop and experiment with new approaches to assessing teaching quality and classroom dynamics.”
Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness (2016, background): “Many studies cast doubt on the validity of SET as a measure of teaching effectiveness (see Johnson [4, Chapters 3-5] for a review and analysis, Pounder [18] for a review, and Galbraith et al.”
An Evaluation of Course Evaluations (2014, background): “However, questions about using SET as the sole source of evidence about teaching for merit and promotion, and the efficacy of evaluation questions and methods of interpretation persist [5].”
Moving from Marketization to Marketing of Higher Education: The Co-Creation of Value in Higher Education. (2014, background): “, satisfaction) in assessing faculty performance related to the delivery of pedagogy (Chen & Hoshower, 2003; Clayson & Haley, 2011; Culver, 2010; Denson, Loveday, & Dalton, 2010; Dolnicar & Grun, 2009; Ewing, 2012; Germain & Scandura, 2005; Langbein, 2008; Pounder, 2007; Shevlin, Bantard, Davies, & ”
Student evaluation of courses: what predicts satisfaction? (2010, background): “Harder courses tend to receive lower ratings (Pounder, 2007), as do required courses (Wachtel, 1998).”
Student evaluations of teaching: combining the meta-analyses and demonstrating further evidence for effective use (2012, background): “However, Onwuegbuzie, Daniel, and Collins ( 2009 , 206) concluded with ‘serious doubt on the score validity of STEs [ sic ], particularly in terms of areas of content‐related validity and construct‐related validity’, and Pounder ( 2007 ) echoed these concerns over the utility and validity of SETs.”