Privacy Protection and Technology Diffusion: The Case of Electronic Medical Records

By Amalia R. Miller, Catherine E. Tucker. Management Sciences, 2009

330 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Epidemiology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cad3f066297ddd2a204753515ba068f47faefb06

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Epidemiology

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Information security and privacy in healthcare: current state of research (2010, methodology): “…methods including surveys, econometric analysis and statistical modelling in the areas of patients' privacy concern, public policy, fraud control, risk management and impact of health IT on medical errors (Bansal et al., 2007; Koppel et al., 2005; Miller and Tucker, 2009; Rosenberg, 2001a, 2001b).”
Privacy Regulation and Market Structure (2015, background): “The debate about privacy regulation has focused on the trade-off between protection of consumer privacy and continued innovation in a vibrant industry (Miller and Tucker, 2009; Department of Commerce, 2010; FTC, 2010; Goldfarb and Tucker, 2011; Tucker, 2014).”
Estimation of Treatment Effects from Combined Data: Identification versus Data Security (2015, methodology): “This is clearly shown in both the lab experiments in Gross and Acquisti (2005), Acquisti and Grossklags (2008), as well as in the real-world environment in Acquisti, Friedman, and Telang (2006), Miller and Tucker (2009) and Goldfarb and Tucker (2010).”
Why Do Salespeople Quit? An Empirical Examination of Own and Peer Effects on Salesperson Turnover Behavior (2017, methodology): “…we specify a random-effects or frailty term in the PHM to account for endogeneity, if any, in group formation (George, Kumar, and Grewal 2013; Miller and Tucker 2009).10 Furthermore, to account for regional and store-level variables that could influence the results, we include regional…”
Economic Policy for Artificial Intelligence (2018, background): “Broadly, however, the evidence to date indicates that most attempts at government‐ mandated privacy regulation lead to slower technology adoption and less innova‐ tion (Goldfarb and Tucker 2011, Miller and Tucker 2011, Kim and Wag‐ man 2015). For example, Goldfarb and Tucker (2011) provide evidence ”
Secrets and Likes: The Drive for Privacy and the Difficulty of Achieving It in the Digital Age (2020, background): “…no shortage of studies showing privacy regulation to have, other than its intended impact of privacy protection itself, also negative effects on some economic metrics— for instance, loss of advertising effectiveness (Goldfarb & Tucker, 2011) or impaired technology adoption (Miller & Tucker, 2009).”
Social Networks, Personalized Advertising, and Privacy Controls (2013, background): “…ad content that has specific and concrete personal information compared with ad content that uses non1Some evidence shows, however, that such individual controls impose costs on the systems considering adopting privacy controls (Campbell, Goldfarb, and Tucker 2015; Miller and Tucker 2009).”