Two Replicable Suppressor Situations in Personality Research
By D. Paulhus, Richard W. Robins, Kali Trzesniewski, Jessica L. Tracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2004
625 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9acb55e77aac2981cad24ee1a6c331874ed5f9c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Jessica L. Tracy
- Richard W. Robins
- P. D. Harms
- Joey T. Cheng
- A. Cichocka
- D. Paulhus
- J. Hooley
- S. Rosenthal
In Social Psychology
- Constantine Sedikides
- T. Wildschut
- C. Routledge
- Jessica L. Tracy
- Jamie Arndt
- Richard W. Robins
- Joey T. Cheng
- Xinyue Zhou
Citations in the corpus
- To nostalgize: mixing memory with affect and desire (2015, result): “We replicated the prior findings (i.e., suppressor situation; Paulhus et al., 2004), demonstrating directionally opposite causal effects of loneliness on nostalgia and perceived social support.”
- Variance Inflation Factor: As a Condition for the Inclusion of Suppressor Variable(s) in Regression Analysis (2015, background): “[11] concluded that the level of education was a suppressor variable in predicting salary of administrators for both public and private educational institutions [15].”
- Moral emotions and moral behavior. (2007, neutral): “…and the propensity to blame factors beyond the self for one’s misfortunes (Andrews et al. 2000, Bennett, et al. 2005, Harper & Arias 2004, Paulhus et al. 2004, Tangney & shame-prone, shame-prone individuals are more likely to engage in externalization of blame, that anger in destructive…”
- Measuring cognitive ability with the overclaiming technique (2004, background): “The best known of the formulas is d prime, although other formulas such as the difference between hit rate and false-alarm rate (difference score) are more intuitively compelling (Macmillan & Creelman, 1991; Paulhus & Petrusic, 2002; Swets, 1986).”
- The psychological structure of pride: a tale of two facets. (2007, methodology): “This variable—the NPI controlling for the RSE— might be more similar to traditional conceptualizations of narcissism (i.e., Kernberg, 1975; Kohut, 1976) than are raw scores on the NPI ( Paulhus et al., 2004 ).”
- Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status (2010, background): “In fact, previous research has demonstrated that genuine self-esteem—controlling for narcissism—tends to be negatively associated with the anti-social and aggressive behaviors typical of dominant leaders (Donnellan et al., 2005; Paulhus et al., 2004).”
- Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism (2016, background): “For example, while narcissism predicts antisocial attitudes, non-narcissistic self-esteem predicts more positive interpersonal attitudes (e.g., Locke, 2009; Paulhus et al., 2004).”
- The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science (2013, background): “Further analysis revealed that the low bivariate correlations combined with greater weights in the SEM likely reflected a suppressor effect [34,35].”