Criteria for Re-Defining Idioms: Are We Barking Up the Wrong Tree?.

By Lynn Grant, L. Bauer. 2004

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c97a21776c800f82c542e4a68ca714c5d2a64983

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. N. Schmitt
2. Ron Martinez
3. E. Peters
4. M. Garnier
5. Stuart Webb
6. Maggie Charles
7. Lars Stenius Stæhr
8. Parveneh Tavakoli

In Language and Linguistics

1. N. Schmitt
2. Ron Martinez
3. E. Peters
4. M. Garnier
5. Stuart Webb
6. Maggie Charles
7. Lars Stenius Stæhr
8. V. Brezina

Citations in the corpus

• A Phrasal Expressions List (2012, background): “Grant and Bauer (2004) would deem at all times as compositional, since its meaning is still retained when each lexical word is replaced with its own definition (p.”