The Usefulness of Measuring Disruptiveness of Innovations Ex Post in Making Ex Ante Predictions*
By V. Govindarajan, Praveen K. Kopalle. 2006
374 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c95dbe466acdd556ff51a4eebca08c09d8f89320
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Management Science and Operations Research
Citations in the corpus
- Disruptive Innovation: An Intellectual History and Directions for Future Research (2018, neutral): “Such anomalies produced more precise categorizations of disruptions (Govindarajan and Kopalle, 2006; Markides, 2006).”
- A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory (2008, background): “Especially noteworthy is the contribution made by Govindarajan and Kopalle, who extends their measure to include high-end, as well as, low-end disruptions, provides a more general view of disruptiveness of innovations, and does not only focus on low price/low performance [40].”
- Antecedents and implications of disruptive innovation: Evidence from China (2015, neutral): “…innovation management literature (Abernathy and Clark, 1985; Adner, 2002, 2006; Calia et.al., 2007; Christensen, 2006; Christensen and Bower, 1996; Christensen and Raynor, 2003; Danneels, 2004; Govindarajan and Kopalle, 2006; Hall et. al., 2014; Kassicieh et.al., 2002; Linton, 2002, 2004, 2009).”