Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection

By Jin Woo Lee, Soung Hie Kim. Computers & Operations Research, 2000

630 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c901e8afaa9d9ad5b11196ceef353ffa5a26a5ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Analytic network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator (2005, positive): “Lee and Kim (2000) used the above-cited ANP approach within a zeroone goal-programming (ZOGP) model to suggest an information system project selection methodology, which can reflect interdependencies among evaluation criteria and candidate projects.”
R&D project selection using the analytic network process (2002, methodology): “Lee and Kim [12], [13] used ANP to facilitate an information system project selection problem made more complex due to the need to consider the interdependencies among criteria and candidate projects.”
A framework for weighting of criteria in ranking stage of material selection process (2012, background): “Furthermore, the key for the ANP is to determine the relationship structure among features in advance [50] and to answer the questions precisely, while it is usually hard for DM to give the true relationship structure by considering many criteria (especially in material selection).”
A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach (2006, background): “Lee and Kim (2000, 2001) suggest an improved IS project selection methodology which reflects interdependencies among evaluation criteria and candidate projects using ANP within a zero-one goal programming model.”
An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection (2005, background): “Lee and Kim (2000) claimed that Santhanam and Kyparisis’ model dealt with IS selection problems with limited criteria.”
Developing a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for PESTEL Analysis (2012, background): “However, many decision-making problems cannot always be structured hierarchically; among the elements of a problem, there can be interaction and dependence (Saaty & Takizawa, 1986; Saaty, 1996; Lee & Kim, 2000; Yüksel & Dağdeviren, 2007).”
Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach (2006, methodology): “This provides a more accurate approach for modeling complex decision environment (Meade and Sarkis, 1999; Lee and Kim, 2000; Agarwal and Shankar, 2002b, 2003; Yurdakul, 2003).”
A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model Combined with DEMATEL and ANP with Applications (2008, methodology): “The ANP has been applied successfully in many practical decision-making problems, such as project selection, product planning, green supply chain management, and optimal scheduling problems (Meade and Presley (2002), Lee and Kim (2000), Karsak et al. (2002), Sarkis (2003), Momoh and Zhu (2003)).”
A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment (2013, methodology): “ANP has been applied successfully in many practical decision-making problems [15,17,21,22,39,46].”
An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method (2011, methodology): “…(AHP) (Saaty, 1980), which has been used for MCDM, to release the restriction of hierarchical structure, and has been applied to project selection (Lee & Kim, 2000; Meade & Presley, 2002), product planning, strategic decision (Karsak, Sozer, & Alptekin, 2003; Lin, Chiu, & Tsai, 2008; Sarkis,…”