Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions
By Henk W. Volberda. 2005
133 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c901cc458d3900976f78df24ee77d5885ca3d70d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Mary J. Benner
- Mary Tripsas
- D. Krupp
- Pat Barclay
- Giovanni Gavetti
- Sarah Kaplan
- J. Eggers
- Ioannis Ioannou
Citations in the corpus
- The Influence of Prior Industry Affiliation on Framing in Nascent Industries: The Evolution of Digital Cameras (2012, background): “documented in a range of industries from synthetic dyes ( Murmann 2003 ) to microprocessors (Khazam”
- The burden of proof for a cultural group selection account (2014, background): “39 WWII, British and American governments, universities, and firms started to copy German R&D institutions on a large scale (Murmann, 2003).”
- The role of human capital and innovation in economic development: evidence from post-Malthusian Prussia (2017, unknown): “27 The fact that the Gymnasium dominated numerically secondary education (on 26 See, for example, Murmann (2003) and Grupp et al. (2002).”
- Customer preference discontinuities: a trigger for radical technological change (2008, background): “…(Abernathy, 1978), historians of technology have documented cycles of radical and incremental technological change in multiple industries including photography (Jenkins, 1975), jet engines (Constant II, 1980), watches (Landes, 1983), machine tools (Noble, 1984), and synthetic dyes (Murmann, 2003).”