Family Group Conferencing and Re‐Offending Among First‐Time Juvenile Offenders: The Indianapolis Experiment

By E. McGarrell, N. Hipple. 2007

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8f5660c4062201c172b236f1e4ba140cf22d273

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Lawrence W. Sherman
2. A. Gregory
3. J. Jenson
4. R. Roesch
5. Jodi L. Viljoen
6. Barak Ariel
7. S. Stone
8. E. Penner

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Barak Ariel
2. Lawrence W. Sherman
3. Daniel J. Woods
4. Francis L. Huang
5. E. Greer
6. A. Gregory
7. J. Jenson
8. R. Roesch

Citations in the corpus

• Restorative Justice Conferencing (RJC) Using Face‐to‐Face Meetings of Offenders and Victims: Effects on Offender Recidivism and Victim Satisfaction. A Systematic Review (2013, background): “Petrosino and Soydan (2005) and Eisner (2009) have both suggested that there is an effect in which evaluations associated with people who develop programs are likely to show better outcomes than evaluations in which no developer is a collaborator.”
• Procedural justice versus risk factors for offending: predicting recidivism in youth. (2014, background): “Restorative justice conferences have been shown to increase youths’ perceptions of procedural justice (McGarrell, 2001; Sherman & Barnes, 1997) and decrease the likelihood of reoffending in some cases (Luke & Lind, 2002; McGarrell & Hipple, 2007; Sherman & Barnes, 1997).”
• An Examination of Restorative Interventions and Racial Equity in Out-of-School Suspensions (2018, background): “…RIs have two core features: (a) those affected by an infraction or crime come together to identify how people were impacted by the incident, and (b) they jointly problem-solve and identify actions that will repair the harm (Coates, Umbreit, & Vos, 2003; Gal & Moyal, 2011; McGarrell & Hipple, 2007).”
• Restorative Interventions and School Discipline Sanctions in a Large Urban School District (2016, background): “…found that participants randomly assigned to conferencing or to other diversion programming experienced short-term benefits in terms of reduced rates of reoffense after 2 years (McGarrell & Hipple 2007), the benefits were not sustained in a 10-year follow-up (Jeong, McGarrell, & Hipple, 2012).”