The Development of Executive Functioning and Theory of Mind
By Mark A. Sabbagh, Fen Xu, Stephanie M. Carlson, L. J. Moses, Kang Lee. Psychology Science, 2006
731 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8b0295f9ac1f924a6117e5e14ddcf29bee7fe5c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Hannes Rakoczy
- Stephen A. Butterfill
- Teresa McCormack
- Jason Low
- Fred D. Davis
- René Riedl
- Izak Benbasat
- David Gefen
In Social Psychology
- Paul A. Pavlou
- Angelika Dimoka
- Izak Benbasat
- Fred D. Davis
- Jan vom Brocke
- Alan R. Dennis
- Rajiv D. Banker
- René Riedl
Citations in the corpus
- Early childhood bilingualism leads to advances in executive attention: Dissociating culture and language* (2011, background): “, 1998)) are linked to significant cognitive benefits in executive attention (Carlson & Choi, 2008; Lewis et al., 2009; Oh & Lewis, 2008; Sabbagh et al., 2006), then recruited Korean monolinguals in the Republic of Korea may surpass the English monolinguals who receive different cultural nurturing a”
- Specifying Links Between Executive Functioning and Theory of Mind during Middle Childhood: Cognitive Flexibility Predicts Social Understanding (2015, background): “In fact, Carlson, Moses, and colleagues assert that domain-general executive-functioning skills enable children to benefit from social experiences that foster conceptual aspects of theory of mind (Carlson & Moses, 2001; Moses & Tahiroglu, 2010; Sabbagh et al., 2006).”
- On the Use of Neuropyhsiological Tools in IS Research: Developing a Research Agenda for NeuroIS (2012, background): “For example, Sabbagh et al. (2006), identified significant differences in the brain's executive functioning of small children in a cross-cultural study in the United States and China.”
- Cognitive Architecture of Belief Reasoning in Children and Adults: A Primer on the Two-Systems Account (2016, background): “Cultural differences in inhibitory control are not linked to corresponding differences in performance on standard false-belief tasks (35).”
- Theory of mind and inhibitory control in three cultures: Conflict inhibition predicts false belief understanding in Germany, Costa Rica and Cameroon (2006, background): “Moreover, the intercorrelations of inhibitory control and theory of mind tasks in our German, Costa Rican and Cameroonian samples are in line with other studies with US or Asian samples (see Carlson & Moses, 2001; Sabbagh et al., 2006), indicating the possible universality of that relationship.”
- Planning in young children: A review and synthesis (2011, background): “…to indicate that EF components such as inhibitory control may be influenced by children’s social and cultural experiences (e.g., Hewage, Bohlin, Wijewardena, & Lindmark, 2011; Oh & Lewis, 2008; Sabbagh et al., 2006; see special issue of New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development, 2009).”