Outsourcing Public Service Delivery: Management Responses in Noncompetitive Markets
By Amanda M. Girth, A. Hefetz, J. Johnston, M. Warner. 2012
208 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Public Administration, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8a1f5043966d7ce317e0291ddae400378c81f42
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
In Public Administration
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Private finance for public goods: social impact bonds (2013, background): “The literature on contracting has moved beyond simple conceptions of the benefits to be gained from outsourcing public services to private markets, to a more sophisticated understanding of problems with contract design and high transaction costs (Williamson 1999; Van Slyke 2007; Hefetz and Warner 20”
- Contracting or Public Delivery? The Importance of Service, Market and Management Characteristics (2012, background): “Competition is especially critical in for-profit contracts and can be enhanced by separating the contract into subcomponent parts and bidding separately on each (Domberger and Rimmer 1994; Girth et al. 2009; Morgan 1992).”
- Factors explaining inter-municipal cooperation in service delivery: a meta-regression analysis (2016, background): “Girth et al. (2012) point to the opportunity costs of creating a market in for profit contracting, costs that are avoided in inter-municipal contracting.”
- INTER-MUNICIPAL COOPERATION AND COSTS: EXPECTATIONS AND EVIDENCE (2015, background): “Empirical research has shown that inter-municipal contracting is preferred to for profit contracting when services have higher transactions costs due to asset specificity and lack of competition (Girth et al., 2012; Hefetz and Warner, 2012; Levin and Tadelis, 2010).”