What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition

By D. Slobin. 2006

308 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c82ea30572be38a509e6475d4389d92d1db80cdb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Conceptual transfer: Crosslinguistic effects in categorization and construal* (2010, result): “…of cognitive linguistics, Slobin himself has concentrated on how it relates to Talmy’s work on the cognitive semantics of motion events (e.g., Slobin, 2004, 2005, 2006), and this is also true of most of the work in this line of research, including the articles in the present issue by Brown…”
Event categorisation and language: A cross-linguistic study of motion (2010, background): “Slobin, 2004 , 2006 ; Talmy, 1985 , 1991 , 2000 ).”
L1 transfer in the acquisition of manner and path in Spanish by native speakers of English (2012, unknown): “In the present article we use Talmy’s (1985, 2000a, 2000b) framework for the description of a motion event. According to Talmy (1985, pp. 60–61), ‘The basic motion event consists of one object (the “Figure”) moving or located with respect to another object (the reference object or “Ground”).’ The mo”
Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms (2010, background): “Some proponents of linguistic relativity expect linguistic encoding patterns to permeate spatial memory and to surface in both recognition and recall in spatial tasks (see Slobin, 2006).”
Learning from others: children's construction of concepts. (2009, background): “Covert and implicit categorizations in language often are language specific, with some languages including distinctions that are unavailable (or not readily available) in other languages (Danziger 2005, Slobin 2006).”
Speaking and remembering in one or two languages: bilingual vs. monolingual lexicalization and memory for motion events (2011, background): “They may be said to have two different thinking-for-speaking modes (see Slobin, 1997, 2003, 2006) but this does not indicate that any language effects can be found beyond the use of the language itself, for example, in recognition memory (discussed in the next section).”
Transfer of conceptualization patterns in bilinguals: The construal of motion events in Turkish and German* (2010, methodology): “and convergence can be found in Treffers-Daller (2009). of semantic transfer.”