Bilingual: Life and Reality
By François Grosjean. 2010
1,139 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7e3bc6a06f4cb8f25a81f1f4697335a236cf822
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Carol Jaensch
- Maria Polinsky
- Jean–Marc Dewaele
- Ofelia García
- Claire E. Sylvan
- Jeanine Treffers-Daller
- A. Sorace
- Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
Citations in the corpus
- Pedagogies and Practices in Multilingual Classrooms: Singularities in Pluralities (2011, background): “There was also recognition that Māori children were not two monolinguals in one—a prevalent view of bilingualism in the past that has been challenged by many (see, e.g., Grosjean, 1982, 2010).”
- Dominance and Age in Bilingualism. (2014, background): “However daunting in practical terms it may be, rigorous expansion on the longitudinal work of Caldas and Caron–Caldas (2000, 2002), Grosjean (2010), Olsson and Sullivan (2005) inter alia holds the promise of fully exposing the textured dynamic of linguistic dominance from childhood 45 into old age.”
- The neuroanatomy of bilingualism: how to turn a hazy view into the full picture (2016, background): “languages other than their own, with estimates that more than half of the world’s population uses two or more languages (Grosjean, 2010) and two-thirds of the”
- What Defines Language Dominance in Bilinguals? (2019, background): “…namely language proficiency (how well languages are known either productively or receptively) and language use (how frequently bilinguals use their languages and how these are divided across domains such as home, work, and school) (Fishman et al. 1968, Grosjean 2010, Treffers-Daller 2016).”
- Understanding heritage languages (2019, background): “(Rothman, 2009: 156) As with all definitions meant to neatly characterize a heterogeneous group of individuals, this one is an idealization, as is the idealized monolingual (e.g., Chomsky, 1965) or the truly balanced bilingual (Grosjean, 2010).”
- Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism (2011, background): “This in turn is a concrete move away from the concept of bilingualism as the ‘sum of two monolinguals’, which Grosjean (1998, 2010) was the first to challenge.”
- Bilingualism: Consequences for Mind and Brain (2012, background): “It is generally believed that more than half of the world’s population is bilingual [1].”
- Lingua receptiva (LaRa) – remarks on the quintessence of receptive multilingualism (2012, background): “A number of studies report on other aspects of inferencing, such as activation in bilingualism (Grosjean, 2008, 2010), LaRa communication (Rehbein & Massakowa, forthcoming) and the connection between understanding and inferencing in reading texts (Berthele, 2007a, 2007b).”
- What is special about L3 processing?* (2013, background): “4 Videsott, Herrnberger, Hoenig, Schilly, Grothe, Wiater, Spitzer and Kiefer (2010) looked at word production in multilinguals.”
- Multilinguals' perceptions of feeling different when switching languages (2013, methodology): “The aim of the present study is thus to pursue this line of inquiry (Grosjean 2010; Ożańska-Ponikwia, 2011, 2012; Pavlenko 2006; Wilson 2008) adopting a combined quantitative and qualitative approach.”
- Translanguaging: Definitions, Implications, and Further Needs in Burgeoning Inquiry (2017, neutral): “These heteroglossic perspectives reject entrenched ideologies that frame monolingualism as a norm in human communication, and that uphold a native speaker paradigm for language proficiency (Cook, 1997, 1999; Grosjean, 1989, 2010).”
- Translanguaging in EFL classrooms: Teachers’ perceptions and practices (2019, background): “For Grosjean (2010), “bilinguals are those who use two or more languages (or dialects) in their everyday lives” (p. 4).”
- A Multilingual Perspective on Translanguaging (2017, background): “Grosjean (1982, 2010) contrasts the holistic view with the fractional or monolingual view of bilingualism, which looks to native speakers of each language as ‘‘monolingual norms’’ against which the bilingual’s two languages are each compared.”