Industrial Performance, Agglomeration, and Foreign Manufacturing Investment in the UK

By Nigel Driffield, Max Munday. 2000

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7ced6e68826adb9c948aeb7d9de58b3fea61805

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. K. Taylor
2. L. D. Propris
3. C. Jones
4. S. Pal
5. S. Bhaumik
6. Canfei He
7. M. Wiersema
8. H. P. Bowen

In Strategy and Management

1. H. P. Bowen
2. K. Meyer
3. Dean Xu
4. Shaker A. Zahra
5. Sea-Jin Chang
6. C. Jones
7. S. Bhaumik
8. Yama Temouri

Citations in the corpus

• Contrasts in agglomeration: proto-industrial, industrial and post-industrial forms compared (2003, background): “It seems clear, for example, that the processes of vertical and horizontal disintegration of production that might in theory lead to the formation of localized linkages are disrupted where multilocational firms are concerned (Driffield and Munday, 2000; Henry, 1992: 381–82; Phelps, 1993).”
• International business research and risky investments, an analysis of FDI in conflict zones (2013, background): “This is discussed at length in a number of review articles, in economics and regional science, as well as international business and strategy, see for example Wiersema, and Bowen (2008), Driffield and Munday (2000), Bhaumik et al (2010) Girma (2002) .”
• Information costs, agglomeration economies and the location of foreign direct investment in China1 (2002, background): “1998; DRIFFIELD and MUNDAY, 2000).”
• Does ownership structure of emerging-market firms affect their outward FDI? The case of the Indian automotive and pharmaceutical sectors (2010, methodology): “The baseline specification is essentially one that is used in the literature to test the postulates of the OLI theory (see for example Driffield and Munday, 2000, and the references therein).”
• What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth?: A survey of the literature (2006, background): “In a similar vein, D riffield and M unday ( 2000 ) find that the comparative advantage of UK manufacturing industries significantly increases with inflowing foreign direct investment.”
• Corporate diversification: the impact of foreign competition, industry globalization, and product diversification (2008, background): “Similarly, increased foreign presence in an industry has been found to increase productivity and efficiency (Chung, 2001b) and to increase the comparative advantage of the domestic industry (Driffield and Munday, 2000).”
• The determinants of tax haven FDI (2016, background): “This is discussed at length in a number of review articles, in economics and regional science, as well as IB and strategy (see e.g. Bhaumik, Driffield, & Pal, 2010; Driffield & Munday, 2000; Girma, 2002; Wiersema & Bowen, 2008).”
• The Importance of Clusters for Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Sourcing (2006, background): “The theoretical basis for the importance of agglomeration, and particularly agglomeration based on the ability to attract FDI, is derived from theoretical models of industrial development (see, for example, Markusen and Venables, 1999). Agglomeration serves to increase the potential for technology t”
• Foreign-based competition and corporate diversification strategy (2005, background): “Foreign-based competition can be both stronger in its effects and more disruptive than domesticbased competition, and it can therefore have significantly greater economic and competitive ramifications for a country’s domestic markets (e.g., Caves, 1974, 1982, 1996; Chung, 2001a, 2001b; De Backer, 20”
• Spillovers and competition among foreign and local firms in China (2008, background): “Foreign firms’ employment share in national markets have positive spillover effects on local firm survival, confirming previous research that showed a similar positive net effect at the country level (Buckley et al., 2002; Caves, 1974; Driffield and Munday, 2000; Liu et al., 2000; Sinai and Meyer, 2”
• FDI and the Labour Market: A Review of the Evidence and Policy Implications (2000, background): “The link between R&D and FDI has been understood for some time, see for example Driffield and Munday (2000), although the suggestion is that R&D facilitates foreign entry, via the creation of firm-specific assets, rather than as a mechanism for MNEs to acquire local technology.”
• The survival of international new ventures (2007, background): “Industry growth, penetration by foreign firms and seller concentration can significantly influence a firm’s survival in international markets (Hennart and Park, 1993; Driffield and Munday, 1997).”