Interacting with limited mobility resources: Psychological range levels in electric vehicle use

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Understanding charging behaviour of electric vehicle users (2013, methodology): “To better understand the efficient use of energy (i.e., mobility) resources, we have developed a conceptual model (Franke & Krems, 2013; Franke, Neumann, et al., 2012), based on principles of self-regulation and control theory (Carver & Scheier, 1998; Fuller, 2011).”
A stochastic flow-capturing model to optimize the location of fast-charging stations with uncertain electric vehicle flows (2017, background): “Chéron and Zins (1997); Eberle and von Helmolt (2010); Franke and Krems (2013) find that many consumers are unwilling to purchase EVs if a ‘safety net’ of charging stations that covers their anticipated driving needs is not available.”
Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid applications: A Nordic choice experiment (2019, background): “4% trips across Nordic consumers) (22), even when accounting for psychological range anxiety buffers (on average, about 14 km) (24).”
What drives range preferences in electric vehicle users (2013, background): “Similar safety buffers have also been identified in range utilization behavior of experienced EV users (Franke et al., 2012c; Franke and Krems, 2013).”
Fear and loathing of electric vehicles: The reactionary rhetoric of range anxiety (2019, background): “9 kms, implying that consumers became more comfortable with the range of their EV and experienced less anxiety (16).”