Institutional Reform and the Bianzhi System in China
By Kjeld Erik Brødsgaard. The China Quarterly, 2002
161 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c794a7df3ad8259e32c86146cf54c16a476856da
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- “Building a New Socialist Countryside” – Only a Political Slogan? (2009, unknown): “The core cadres of a certain administrative unit, such as a county government, form the lingdao banzi of that unit (see e.g. Brødsgaard 2002, 2009: 79-82; Burns 2003; Kim 2005).”
- An integrated model of principal transformational leadership and teacher leadership that is related to teacher self-efficacy and student academic performance (2020, background): “Bianzhi is also a special system in China, which defines whether teachers are on the government tenure-track (Brødsgaard, 2002).”
- The three faces of China: Strategic alliance partner selection in three ethnic Chinese economies (2014, background): “One could expect that China, with its lower level of development to emphasize informal institutions, especially because its reforms regarding law and governance have developed only haltingly (Brødsgaard, 2002; Peng & Jiang, 2010).”