The governance of innovation in Europe

By Philip Cooke. 2000

357 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c781ca618a2767bccd183ff23f3d683f22483af5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Innovation and Networking in Peripheral Areas—a Case Study of Emergence and Change in Rural Manufacturing (2007, background): “Relations along the value chain go beyond market relations and are of a network type (Cooke et al., 2000, p. 75).”
Future governance of innovation policy in Europe — three scenarios (2001, background): “…innovation systems”; where regional innovation policy institutions have relatively far-reaching autonomy, elements of regional innovation systems can also be discerned (Cooke et al., 2000; Howells, 1999; Brazcyk et al., 1998; the German Land Baden-Württemberg is often cited here as an example).”
Innovation in knowledge intensive industries: The nature and geography of knowledge links (2006, background): “The concept of regional innovation systems (Autio, 1998 ; Braczyk et al , 1998 ; Cooke et al , 2000 ; Doloreux, 2002 ) has led to a better understanding of the role played by the institutional infrastructure in supporting local learning and innovation and it has clarified the policy dimension ”
From Technopoles to Regional Innovation Systems: The Evolution of Localised Technology Development Policy (2001, background): “(Cooke 1992; Todtling and Sedlacek 1997; Cooke,2000a; Cooke et al 2000 ).”
Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy (2001, methodology): “In a further research study ( Cooke et al., 2000 ) funded by the TSER programme of the European Commission, 11 regions in the EU and in Eastern and Central Europe were examined with a common research methodology to establish the extent to which RISs existed.”
Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix (2013, background): “Indeed, there is no region in the EU that enjoys more political autonomy (Cooke and Morgan, 1998), and it is one of the few European regions that can be considered a true ‘regional innovation system’ (Tödling and Kaufmann, 1999; Cooke et al., 2000; OECD, 2011).”
Regional Innovation Systems: General Findings and Some New Evidence from Biotechnology Clusters (2002, background): “In the paper, the first section will argue the case for regional innovation systems, drawing on theoretical and empirical findings from the elevenregion REGIS project (see Cooke et al., 2000 ).”
An evolutionary integrated view of Regional Systems of Innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives (2005, background): “…the specific institutions that deliberately promote innovation and knowledge, as well as the wider socio-economic system in which political and cultural influences and specific modes of governance determine innovation structures and performances (Lundvall, 1992; Cooke et al., 2000; Freeman, 2002).”
Knowledge Intensive Business Services and Urban Industrial Development (2007, background): “On the other hand, a number of innovation surveys show that consultancy services (delivered by KIBS firms) are regarded as a relatively unimportant source of information in firms’ innovation activity, of far less importance than clients, suppliers, trade fairs and trade journals [Cooke et al., 2000]”
One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach (2005, methodology): “Regarding the distribution of concrete competencies between these levels there exist considerable differences (with varying degrees of political autonomy for regions) within Europe (see Cooke et al. 2000).”