Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy

By Philip Cooke. 2001

1,956 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b75af1aa64729ca8995c788cc37ade04f361684

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers (2006, background): “As such, lead firms play a crucial role and power asymmetry is central to the value chain and the system of innovation governance (Cooke, 2001).”
Regional systems of entrepreneurship: the nexus of human capital, knowledge and new firm formation (2013, background): “Cooke (2001) discusses entrepreneurs and venture capital in the context of regional innovation systems.”
Towards a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems (2018, background): “Innovation is seen through a neo-Schumpeterian lens as the novel recombination of different sources of knowledge (Cooke, 2001).”
An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment (2010, positive): “The literatures on national innovation systems (Dosi, 1999; Freeman, 1995; Murmann, 2003), regional innovation systems (Cooke, 2001; Freeman, 2002) and sectoral innovation systems (Malerba, 2004) likewise reason in terms of the interrelationships between firms and their wider environments, but again”
Measuring Entrepreneurial Ecosystems (2016, background): “However, to fully understand how these fundamental causes lead to this outcome, we first need to gain insight into how systemic conditions lead to entrepreneurial activity (cf. Cooke 2001).”
Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses (2021, background): “These capabilities could include infrastructure, natural resources, institutions, universities, firms, skills, and culture (Cooke, 2001; Maskell & Malmberg, 1999).”
The Systems of Innovation Approach and Innovation Policy: An account of the state of the art (2001, neutral): “Conclusions...................................................................................................................20 References.............................................................................................................................20 2”
Creating Competition? Globalisation and the Emergence of New Technology Producers (2005, background): “aken together, these findings are consistent with the iew that multinationals require the presence of local apabilities and infrastructure before they invest (Lall, 001), and that they tend in recent times to have followed nowledge-based asset-seeking strategies to reinforce heir competitive strengt”
Recent research on competitiveness and clusters: what are the implications for regional policy? (2013, background): “The new definition is more consistent with the thinking about regional innovation systems and learning regions (for example, Cooke, 2001; Asheim and Gertler, 2006).”
Why do some places succeed when others decline? A social interaction model of cluster viability (2008, background): “The literature on clusters stresses the role of knowledge interactions among complementary firms (Cooke, 2001), especially in high-tech sectors where knowledge generation depends on the combination of existing and fragmented knowledge (Antonelli, 2006).”
Perspectives on Cluster Evolution: Critical Review and Future Research Issues (2015, background): “national innovation systems (Lundvall, 1992; Nelson, 1993, Edquist, 2005), varieties of capitalism (Hall & Soskice, 2001) and regional innovation systems (Cooke, 2001; Asheim & Isaksen, 2002; Tödtling & Trippl, 2005).”
The drivers of SME innovation in the regions of the EU (2021, background): “, relative development of institutions and technological infrastructure) simultaneously shapes local firms’ capacity to innovate (Cooke, 2001; Doloreux and Parto, 2005; Asheim and Gertler, 2005; Rodríguez-Pose and Crescenzi, 2008; Parrilli, Balavac and Radicic, 2020).”
Local and Regional Development in Global Value Chains, Production Networks and Innovation Networks: A Comparative Review and the Challenges for Future Research (2013, background): “Because of the great importance that innovation has acquired in promoting economic development over the past 20 years (Cooke, 2001), the GIN becomes a strategic framework for the analysis of current and future trends and leaderships in the globalized economy.”
Leveraging complexity for ecosystemic innovation (2018, background): “Literature on business networks (Breschi and Malerba, 2005; Huggins and Izushi, 2007), as well as evolutionary geography and regional studies (Asheim et al., 2011; Cooke, 2001; ter Wal and Boschma, 2011) explore a diversified variety of localized public-private partnerships, which can be referred to”
From clusters to cluster-based economic development (2008, background): “…resulting from individual actions as well as cooperation of companies, government agencies, universities and other institutions in the national and regional innovation system (Lundvall, 1988; Lundvall, 1993; Freeman, 1995; Edquist, 1997; Cooke and Morgan 1998; Cooke et al., 2000; Cooke, 2001).”
Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects (2015, background): “To a greater or lesser extent, these contributions stress how localized institutions and routines are critical for promoting innovation through their ability to generate collaborative learning (PIORE and SABEL, 1984; AYDALOT, 1988; COOKE, 2001).”