Future governance of innovation policy in Europe — three scenarios

By Stefan Kuhlmann. 2001

316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a78011e92523dfbc12c5209398fd53917837ee6c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

R&D policy instruments – a critical review of what we do and don’t know (2016, background): “…2009); • different levels of public intervention – (sub-national) state or region, national, supra-national region (e.g. EU), and global (Shapira, Klein, and Kuhlmann 2001; Perry and May 2007; Laranja, Uyarra, and Flanagan 2008; Langfeldt et al. 2012); • the rise of “new public management” with…”
Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System (2011, background): “The sustainable backing and reinforcing of knowledge and innovation in the gloCal knowledge economy and society requires a substantive support of the development and evolution of “innovation cultures” [69] (p.”
Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix (2013, background): “3 This situation implies a governance gap between the different evels of innovation policy administration (Kuhlmann, 2001), which ight lead to overlaps among policy initiatives. Indeed, in this egard Uyarra and Flanagan (2010) refer to regions as ‘policy spaces’ n which policy mixes from European, n”
Comparing the evolution of national research policies: what patterns of change? (2007, background): “For example, it is well-known that large multinational companies tend to develop global research strategies (Kuhlmann, 2001; Meyer-Kramer and Reger, 1999), while at least in the European context the frame of reference for public research organisations is still largely national.”
Multilevel innovation policy mix: A closer look at state policies that augment the federal SBIR program (2015, unknown): “Multiple levels of governments have vested interests in innovation policy to strengthen the competitiveness of the economy (or selected sectors of an economy ) and to increase societal welfare (Kuhlmann, 2001: p.954).”
Regional Innovation Systems in the Lisbon strategy (2005, background): “According to Kuhlmann (2001), therefore, it is likely that innovation policy will move towards a multi-level structure with a stronger role for national organizations and authorities.”
The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation (2012, background): “…further (see here the idea and concept of the ‘Academic Firm’, Campbell and Güttel 2005; see also and furthermore Bhaskar 2010; Biegelbauer 2007a; Campbell 2006; Carayannis and Campbell 2006, 2009, 2010, 2011; Dubina 2009; Dubina et al. 2012; Kuhlmann 2001; Lundvall 1992; Nowotny et al. 2003).”
Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges (2018, background): “One striking phenomenon is how new actors are joining policy arenas and public debates, and entering newly emerging spaces (Rip and Joly 2012) more generally, transcending the scope and involvement of ‘classical’ innovation policy ‘stakeholders’ (Kuhlmann 2001).”
Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems (2004, background): “A similar point is made by Kuhlmann who claims that national innovation systems "were discovered...as explanations for the differing degrees of competitiveness of economies, especially of their technological competitiveness and their ability to innovate" ( Kuhlmann (2001, p. 958) .”
'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem (2009, methodology): “The sustainable backing and reinforcing of knowledge and innovation in the gloCal knowledge economy and society requires a substantive supporting of the development and evolution of ‘innovation cultures’ (Kuhlmann, 2001, p.954).”