The role of situational cues in signaling and maintaining stereotype threat.

By M. Murphy, V. J. Taylor. 2012

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Stereotype Threat in Organizations: Implications for Equity and Performance (2015, background): “…and social identity threat heighten vigilance to situational cues in the local environment as members of stereotyped groups seek information about whether their group is valued and accepted there (Garcia & Cohen 2012, Murphy & Taylor 2012, Murphy et al. 2007, Steele et al. 2002) (see Table 1).”
Exploring Identity-Safety Cues and Allyship Among Black Women Students in STEM Environments (2019, background): “…stereotypes stemming from Black women’s race and gender (G. L. Cohen & Garcia, 2005; Moss-Racusin, Dovidio, Brescoll, Graham, & Handelsman, 2012) may heighten social identity threat concerns, and this apprehension can ultimately lead to a variety of deleterious consequences (Murphy & Taylor, 2012).”
The role of STEM professors’ mindset beliefs on students’ anticipated psychological experiences and course interest. (2020, methodology): “According to the cues hypothesis (Murphy et al., 2007; Murphy & Taylor, 2011), when environments contain identity threatening cues, these cues engender psychological concerns among stigmatized individuals regarding how they will be perceived and treated in a setting; these psychological concerns in…”