Individual effects and dynamics in count data models

By Richard Blundell, Rachel Griffith, F. Windmeijer. 2002

555 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c67f29e35304eeffefd767da3cbfed91165c41b2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

The agglomeration of headquarters (2008, methodology): “Covariates are predetermined and orthogonal to uks ,s ≥ t. To estimate the model with instrumental variables, we follow Chamberlain (1992) and Wooldridge (1997) (see also Windmeijer (2002) and Blundell, Griffith and Windmeijer (2000) ); and we use a quasi-differenced transformation to eliminate the”
The Behaviour of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator of Limited Dependent Variable Models in the Presence of Fixed Effects (2004, unknown): “commonly used models that have this property are the Poisson and negative binomial regressions for count data [see Hausman, Hall, and Griliches (1984),(2) Cameron and Trivedi (1998), Allison (2000), Lancaster (2000) and Blundell, Griffith and Windmeijer (2002)] and the exponential regression model f”
GENERALIZED INTEGER-VALUED AUTOREGRESSION (2001, methodology): “Empirical applications of related multivariate models have been reported by Blundell et al. (1999), Berglund and Brännäs (1999) and Brännäs and Brännäs (1998).”
GMM for Panel Count Data Models (2006, methodology): “For the patents-R&D model, Blundell, Griffith and Windmeijer (2002) consider the”
The Heterogeneous Impact of Market Size on Innovation: Evidence from French Firm-Level Exports (2022, methodology): “See Blundell et al. (1999) and Aghion et al. (2016) for a use of this type of control function in a similar specification.”
Diversification, Innovation, and Imitation Inside the Global Technological Frontier (2006, background): “9 at the country/commodity group level, as in other count-data applications (Blundell et al. 2002).”
Social Capital of Young Technology Firms and Their IPO Values: The Complementary Role of Relevant Absorptive Capacity (2011, unknown): “…role in absorbing new knowledge (e.g., 4We include R&D expenditures from both the corresponding year and the previous year on the RHS because the literature indicates the common existence of time lag between R&D expenditures and patent outcomes (e.g., Blundell, Griffith, and Windmeijer 2002).”
Does the Mobility of R&D Labor Increase Innovation? (2015, methodology): “1995) and the dynamic fixed-effect GMM estimator (Blundell et al. 2002).”
When and How Does Business Group Affiliation Promote Firm Innovation? A Tale of Two Emerging Economies (2006, methodology): “Presample Mean PSMi presample = ( ∑ 1980–1990 Yi t )/ 11 (2) Blundell et al. (2002) proved that estimators that use presample means generate consistent estimators and demonstrated with Monte Carlo simulations that they outperform alternative estimation methods such as quasidifferenced generalized…”
Appropriation Strategy and the Motivations to use the Patent System: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level in French Manufacturing (2000, background): “[1987]; BUSSY et al. [1994]; ARUNDEL et al.”
Patent Protection, Market Uncertainty, and R&D Investment (2006, methodology): “In the appendix, we present robustness checks using the entry stock count data estimator proposed by Blundell, Griffith, and Van Reenen (1995) and Blundell, Griffith, and Windmeijer (2002) which allows for correlation between ci and xit.”