Cultural distance and psychic distance: refinements in conceptualisation and measurement
By Carlos M. P. Sousa, F. Bradley. 2008
155 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c63e7834a2521fc733181e8d9a65c37c4e917857
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- The Concept of Distance in International Business Research: A Review and Research Agenda (2016, unknown): “And yet, there is still ambiguity (Ambos and Håkanson 2014; Håkanson and Ambos 2010; Sousa and Bradley 2008).”
- Psychic distance, marketing strategy and performance in export ventures of Brazilian firms (2009, methodology): “Although surprising, this finding is consistent with the results reported by Shoham (1999), Sousa and Bradley (2008a) and Zou et al. (1997).”
- Challenging the Conceptualization and Measurement of Distance and International Experience in Entry Mode Choice Research (2009, methodology): “…Bridson 2008; Kim and Hwang 1992), a larger set of studies have applied it to related psychic distance issues (e.g., Boyacigiller 1990; Dichtl, Koeglmayr, and Mueller 1990; Dow 2000; Drogendijk and Slangen 2006; Ellis 2008; Evans and Mavondo 2002; Håkanson and Ambos 2007; Sousa and Bradley 2006).”
- The PD scale: a measure of psychic distance and its impact on international marketing strategy (2011, background): “It is not surprising that in view of these inconsistencies, several researchers (e.g. Sousa and Bradley, 2008) concluded that a psychic distance measurement scale should be improved further.”