The Loss of Loss Aversion: Will It Loom Larger Than Its Gain?
By David Gal, Derek D. Rucker. 2018
245 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5699b1016ae40fa12b24b273bd5b635dcbfcdf1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In General Decision Sciences
- Andreas Herrmann
- Eric J. Johnson
- Gerd Gigerenzer
- S. Gaechter
- Ralph Hertwig
- Arch G. Woodside
- A. Glöckner
- Robin M. Hogarth
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices (2022, background): “Finally, the evidence of loss aversion that we report in this paper and in Mrkva et al. (2020) reject the idea that loss aversion is a ‘‘fallacy’’ (Gal, 2018).”
- The Bias Bias in Behavioral Economics (2018, result): “For instance, loss aversion is often presented as a truism; in contrast, a review of the literature concluded that the “evidence does not support that losses, on balance, tend to be any more impactful than gains” (Gal and Rucker, 2018).”