Using Credible Advice to Overcome Framing Effects
By James N. Druckman. 2001
252 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5267cb42834723683ae985198f803b2bb5404bb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Decision Sciences
- Rose McDermott
- Charles Taber
- Milton Lodge
- James N. Druckman
- Silvia Bonaccio
- Reeshad S. Dalal
- L. Aarøe
In Safety Research
- James N. Druckman
- Charles Taber
- Milton Lodge
- Rose McDermott
- Reeshad S. Dalal
- Silvia Bonaccio
- Christian Leuz
- Lauren A. Feldman
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Citations in the corpus
- Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences (2006, background): “In addition, receiving advice from a credible source reduces the effects of framing (Druckman, 2001). Many scholars maintain that there are indeed accuracy benefits to be gained by integrating advice that comes from multiple—preferably independent/uncorrelated (Soll, 1999; see also Johnson, Budescu,”
- Emotion and the Framing of Risky Choice (2008, background): “…more risk taking individuals to make more risk-seeking choices and more risk neutral individuals to be more susceptible to framing effects, past research on the effects of risk propensity has been inconclusive (see, e.g., Fagley and Miller 1990, p. 505; Bromiley and Curley 1992; Druckman 2001b ).”
- Political Psychology in the Digital (mis)Information age: A Model of News Belief and Sharing (2020, background): “There is evidence of partisan bias in both the United States (Cambell et al. 1960, Druckman 2001, Kam, 2005) and abroad (Coan et al. 2008, Brader, Tucker, & Duell 2012, Brader et al. 2020).”
- The Automaticity of Affect for Political Leaders, Groups, and Issues: An Experimental Test of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis (2005, background): “A framing effect occurs when, compared to individuals who receive a positive frame, individuals who receive a negative frame are significantly more likely to express a preference for the risk-seeking alternative (see Druckman 2001a).”