Emotion and the Framing of Risky Choice

By James N. Druckman, Rose McDermott. 2008

392 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa41901489654b1f3292ebb1821187c77f1c9470

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

1. L. Aarøe
2. Stuart Soroka
3. Sophie Lecheler
4. James N. Druckman

In Social Psychology

1. L. Aarøe
2. Andreas Schuck
3. Stuart Soroka
4. Sophie Lecheler
5. James N. Druckman
6. Claes H. de Vreese

Citations in the corpus

• Nonrepresentative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making of Elected Politicians (2017, background): “Second, most officials had left office at the time of the study. action, and indeed have been shown to dominate public opinion formation and, subsequently, the decision making of policy actors (Arceneaux 2012; Druckman and McDermott 2008; Levy 2003; Slovic 2000).”
• The Unmet Potential of Interdisciplinary Research: Political Psychological Approaches to Voting and Public Opinion (2009, background): “11 Some recent political science studies that explore over-time processes include Mutz and Reeves (2005); Gerber et al. (2007); Chong and Druckman (2008).”
• Dealing with feelings: Positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects (2012, background): “…interest in news framing effects research; studies have shown that emotions are integral components of news frames (e.g., Nabi, 2003) and that exposure to news framing can cause an individual to have specific emotional reactions (e.g., Druckman and McDermott, 2008; Gross and D’Ambrosio, 2004).”
• Bad News or Mad News? Sentiment Scoring of Negativity, Fear, and Anger in News Content (2015, background): “Physiological research finds quite different patterns of response for the two emotions (e.g., Sinha 1996); the two also produce different degrees of risk perception, and distinct responses on a range of political attitudes (e.g., Druckman and McDermott 2008; Huddy et  al.”
• Investigating Frame Strength: The Case of Episodic and Thematic Frames (2011, background): “Previous literature suggests that the effect of frames and emotions on particular outcomes may vary by context and issue (Druckman & McDermott, 2008, p. 317).”