Following the instructions!: Effects of gender beliefs in mental rotation
By Angelica Moè, Francesca Pazzaglia. 2006
147 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Geography, Planning and Development
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c51da1b7178837eb1dcefa1732c604ae45d7f79c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
- Yukiko Maeda
- So Yoon Yoon
- David H. Uttal
- David I Miller
- Nora S. Newcombe
- Angelica Moè
- Mary Hegarty
- Kerrie Anna Douglas
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Geography, Planning and Development
- David H. Uttal
- Nora S. Newcombe
- Yukiko Maeda
- Angelica Moè
- So Yoon Yoon
- Mary Hegarty
- Kerrie Anna Douglas
- Ș. Purzer
Citations in the corpus
- Exploring and Enhancing Spatial Thinking (2013, background): “Compared with a randomized control condition, Miller and Halpern found that 12 hours of Sorby’s (2009) training improved grades in a challenging calculus-based physics course by one-third of a letter grade (approximately 0.4 standard deviation units).”
- A Meta-Analysis on Gender Differences in Mental Rotation Ability Measured by the Purdue Spatial Visualization Tests: Visualization of Rotations (PSVT:R) (2013, background): “common gender beliefs (Cooke-Simpson and Voyer 2007; Moè 2009; Moè and Pazzaglia 2006) and/or gender stereotypes (Ortner and Sieverding 2008; Sharps et al.”
- Are males always better than females in mental rotation? Exploring a gender belief explanation (2009, methodology): “The two equally complex parts were obtained by submitting the original version of the MRT to a group of 20 high school pupils and then matching the items with an equal percentage of correct answers (Moè & Pazzaglia, 2006).”