Discourse Markers: Language, Meaning, and Context

By D. Schiffrin. 2005

360 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c44fead9b0c9c35f5562c9589c70aa76ef08f8ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. E. Schegloff
2. Gene H. Lerner
3. Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
4. Lorenza Mondada
5. Galina B. Bolden
6. Geoffrey Raymond
7. Kobin H. Kendrick
8. Tanya Stivers

In Language and Linguistics

1. E. Schegloff
2. Gene H. Lerner
3. Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
4. Galina B. Bolden
5. Elizabeth Stokoe
6. J. Hall
7. Arnulf Deppermann
8. Lorenza Mondada

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. E. Schegloff
2. Gene H. Lerner
3. Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
4. Arnulf Deppermann
5. Elizabeth Stokoe
6. Lorenza Mondada
7. Tanya Stivers
8. Kobin H. Kendrick

Citations in the corpus

• Beginning to Respond: Well-Prefaced Responses to Wh-Questions (2009, background): “…on well has, on the whole, aimed for the broadest possible (if not exhaustive) coverage of usages of well, as for example in Jucker (1993), Schiffrin (1985, 1987, 2001), and, most recently, Schourup (2001); indeed, Greasley (1994) extended the contexts of coverage to include commentaries…”
• The development of Dutch connectives : change and acquisition as windows on form-function relations (2005, background): “…from the more local coherence expressed by connectives, I will use the term discourse marker to refer to the global use of these words (cf. Schiffrin 1987, 2001; Lenk 1998; Traugott & Dasher 2002; Auer & Günthner 2003).1 In conclusion: language users have a variety of connectives at their…”