Doing psychology critically : making a difference in diverse settings

By Isaac Prilleltensky, G. Nelson. 2002

343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c37d5dce1be1b1947851f48aa753d6e72f8f38f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

THE ROLE OF POWER IN WELLNESS, OPPRESSION, AND LIBERATION: THE PROMISE OF PSYCHOPOLITICAL VALIDITY (2008, background): “The causes for maintaining an individualistic and intrapsychic orientation in psychology are many and have been reviewed elsewhere (Fox & Prilleltensky, 1997; Journal of Community Psychology DOI: 10.1002/jcop Prilleltensky, 1994; Prilleltensky & Nelson, 2002).”
Xenophobia (2009, background): “Research with recent immigrants and refugees can be grounded in the liberatory communitarian approach described by Prilleltensky and Nelson (2002).”
Best Practice Guidelines on Prevention Practice, Research, Training, and Social Advocacy for Psychologists (2007, methodology): “…action research is one example of collaborative research recognizing that knowledge is coproduced through collaborative action with those who have traditionally been left out of the research process and whose lives are most affected by the research problem (Prilleltensky & Nelson, 2002).”
Training Counseling Psychologists as Social Justice Agents (2004, background): “Without such an expansion, they and others asserted, psychologists are simply maintaining the status quo rather than working toward social change (Albee, 1996; Martin-Baro, 1994; Prilleltensky & Nelson, 2002; Speight & Vera, 2004; Vera & Speight, 2003).”
An Emancipatory Communitarian Approach to Vocational Development Theory, Research, and Practice (2005, background): “…and scholarship within community psychology (Rappaport, 1987; Sarason, 1974), social work (Pinderhughes, 1983; Solomon, 1987), critical psychology (Fox & Prilleltensky, 1997; Prilleltensky & Nelson, 2002; Sloan, 2000), and liberation psychology (Freire, 1984; Hollander, 1997; Martín-Baró, 1994).”
Marriage Amendments and Psychological Distress in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual (LGB) Adults (2009, background): “…building, as transformative change in the larger society requires that our efforts be undergirded with a theory (or theories) of social power that would form the cornerstone of a theory of social injustice, thus advancing a psychology of liberation or emancipation (Prilleltensky & Nelson, 2002).”
Social Justice Through a School Psychology Lens: Definition and Applications (2008, methodology): “The coding procedure for the qualitative responses received in Phase I of this study was an inductive content analysis procedure based on guidelines provided by Ritchie and Lewis (2003) and Marshall and Rossman (1999).”
Happiness, positive psychology and the program of neoliberal governmentality (2011, background): “Similarly, critical psychology, whose theoretical origins are principally with Marxian critical theory (although the methods of governmentality researchers are today more frequently invoked), proceeds along similar lines, albeit with a concentration less on popular culture than on the institutional ”