Consensus: Motor cortex plasticity protocols.
By Ulf Ziemann, Walter Paulus, Michael A. Nitsche, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, W. Byblow, A. Berardelli, Hartwig Roman Siebner, J. Classen, Leonardo G. Cohen, John C. Rothwell. Brain Stimulation, 2008
620 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Neurology, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c261dc183def7fa1c2058aa084edb3553f836ba1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
In Neurology
- Leonardo G. Cohen
- John C. Rothwell
- Alvaro Pascual-Leone
- Michael A. Nitsche
- Til Ole Bergmann
- Ulf Ziemann
- Gesa Hartwigsen
- Walter Paulus
In Surgery
Citations in the corpus
- A common polymorphism in the brain‐derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) modulates human cortical plasticity and the response to rTMS (2008, background): “Email: b.cheeran@ion.ucl.ac.uk A number of TMS protocols lead to after-effects on the excitability of the human motor cortex that persist for 30 min to several hours (see review by Ziemann et al. 2008).”
- The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. (2013, background): “Evidence suggests that at least some of these effects depend on activity in N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptors and hence it is thought that they represent an analog of early stages of synaptic plasticity in the human brain (Ziemann et al. 2008).”
- Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). (2014, neutral): “…between rTMS effects and experimental data on long-term synaptic plasticity, Ziemann and other authors (Ziemann, 2004; Cooke and Bliss, 2006; Ziemann et al., 2008) have underscored that the plausibility of such a hypothesis was only based on indirect arguments and common output effects.”
- TMS and drugs revisited 2014. (2015, background): “This is possible because tDCS and TMS can induce alterations in cortical excitability, which outlast the stimulation period and map onto synaptic plasticity (Ziemann et al., 2008).”
- Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee (2015, background): “…variables explains why measurements of MEP amplitude are the most popular electrophysiological ‘‘read out’’ to assess after-effects of repetitive TMS and other non-invasive brain stimulation protocols applied over M1 on corticospinal excitability (Siebner and Rothwell, 2003; Ziemann et al., 2008).”
- Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non‐invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects (2010, background): “There is compelling evidence that the effects of these NBS techniques are largely due to long term potentiation (LTP)-like and long term depression (LTD)-like mechanisms (see Cooke & Bliss 2006; Thickbroom, 2007; Wagner et al. 2007; Ziemann et al. 2008).”
- Inferring Causality from Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Cognitive Neuroscience (2020, methodology): “Stimulation intensity and duration are crucial determinants for offline effects with both TMS (Ziemann et al., 2008) and TCS (Nitsche et al., 2008).”