Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non‐invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects
By Michael C. Ridding, Ulf Ziemann. Journal of Physiology, 2010
781 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16f0dff4f9815c62396d1b7573a947246e708c10
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Til Ole Bergmann
- Gesa Hartwigsen
- John C. Rothwell
- Alkomiet Hasan
- Wiam Al Qasem
- M. Abubaker
- Sarah Wiethoff
- Nagako Murase
In Neurology
- Til Ole Bergmann
- Gesa Hartwigsen
- John C. Rothwell
- Sarah Wiethoff
- Masashi Hamada
- Leonardo G. Cohen
- Ulf Ziemann
Citations in the corpus
- Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. (2014, background): “A number of determinants have been identified [17], and previously we had found that the response to TBS protocols was well predicted by the latency difference between MEPs evoked by single TMS pulses of different orientations [10].”
- Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. (2014, neutral): “Several reasons have been put forward for the considerable variability in the response to NIBS protocols, such as time of day [35], anatomical aspects as cortical thickness [36], coil orientation [37], genetic variation [38].”
- The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. (2013, background): “Variability of TBS Responses As noted in the Introduction, there is a very large interindividual variation in the response to TMS protocols that test early forms of synaptic plasticity in the human motor cortex (Ridding and Ziemann 2010).”
- Working Memory and Transcranial-Alternating Current Stimulation—State of the Art: Findings, Missing, and Challenges (2022, background): “Furthermore, NIBS-induced plasticity can be significantly modulated by many neuropharmacological agents (Möhler, 2006; Ridding and Ziemann, 2010).”
- Inferring Causality from Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Cognitive Neuroscience (2020, background): “…of synaptic activity, hormonal levels, circadian rhythms) or across individuals (e.g., sex, age, individual depth and orientation of target region, genetics; Ridding & Ziemann, 2010), sometimes leading to null results (Beaulieu, Flamand, Massé-Alarie, & Schneider, 2017; Heidegger et al., 2017).”