Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Size

By Krishna Udayasankar. 2008

851 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c215f9640032c93ddde03c492773c03035c4bf10

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Corporate social responsibility in tourism small and medium enterprises evidence from Europe and Latin America (2013, result): “…of SMEs (Hillary, 2004) it is important to note that the reasons for introducing CSR in SMEs may be different from those of large enterprises (Udayasankar, 2008) and may be consistent with the owner’s values (Murillo & Lozano, 2006), the need to improve community relationships (Chrisman &…”
Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Impact on Firms’ Investment Policy, Organizational Structure, and Performance (2012, background): “and (2)], we do not find the U-shaped relation between firm size and CSR hypothesized by Udayasankar (2008). However, when we disaggregate the KLD index into strengths and concerns [models (3) to (6)], we find a strong evidence of U-shaped relation between firm size and CSR.”
Green Microfinance: Characteristics of Microfinance Institutions Involved in Environmental Management (2013, background): “On this dimension, the relationship between size and environmental performance thus seems to follow the U-shape suggested by Udayasankar (2008), with medium-sized MFIs performing less well.”
New Evidence on the Role of the Media in Corporate Social Responsibility (2016, neutral): “…interests. more valuable for larger firms (e.g., Ioannou and Serafeim 2012; Ho et al. 2012; Jackson and Apostoloku 2010; Bertels and Peloza 2008; Udayasankar 2007; Aerts et al. 2006), we seek to more definitively answer whether size matters by examining the interaction of firm size and media…”