Mapping a 40-Year History With Leximancer: Themes and Concepts in the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

By Julia Cretchley, David Rooney, C. Gallois. 2010

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c124c5599f6f48601c83ac3f5c03c78087ee62c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. G. Dowling
2. Timothy M. Devinney
3. Ralf Wilden

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Violetta Wilk
2. Claire Lambert
3. Stephanie Meek
4. G. Dowling
5. Timothy M. Devinney
6. Ralf Wilden

Citations in the corpus

• Choosing a qualitative data analysis tool: a comparison of NVivo and Leximancer (2014, background): “Further to this, Cretchley, Rooney, and Gallois (2010b) made an important distinction between Leximancer and NVivo by suggesting that the former ’ s grounded approach enabled the analyst to take an exploratory style, letting the list of concepts to emerge automatically from the text.”
• The Architecture of Dynamic Capability Research Identifying the Building Blocks of a Configurational Approach (2016, methodology): “The Leximancer algorithm has been used successfully in previous research to scientometrically describe and analyze text – for example, in corporate risk management (Martin & Rice, 2007), innovation (Randhawa et al., 2016), tourism (Scott & Smith, 2005), project governance (Biesenthal & Wilden, 2014)”
• A big data exploration of the informational and normative influences on the helpfulness of online restaurant reviews (2021, background): “Further, reviewees give “Like(s)” to reviews which gave restaurants a favourable good or moderate rating (e.g., 3 or 4 rating being associated with the “Likes” tag on the Concept Map), which may be indicative of these reviews being more believable and authentic, and consequently, more helpful.”