Is Leader–Member Exchange Differentiation Beneficial or Detrimental for Group Effectiveness? A Meta-Analytic Investigation and Theoretical Integration
By A. Yu, Fadel K. Matta, B. Cornfield. Academy of Management Journal, 2017
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Despite the burgeoning number of studies that have examined leader–member exchange (LMX) differentiation, definitive conclusions regarding its effects remain scarce. We propose a theoretical framew...
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0fbb3e05452345419421f14160b0ba16702d9ae
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Frameworks for developing impactful systematic literature reviews and theory building: What, Why and How? (2023, unknown): “The input-mediator-outcome (IMO) framework (Ilgen et al., 2005; Mathieu et al., 2008) asserts that the relationship between inputs and outcomes is transmitted through important mediational influences (Yu et al., 2017).”
- Benevolence and authority as WEIRDly unfamiliar: A multi-language meta-analysis of paternalistic leadership behaviors from 152 studies (2019, background): “…the relatively recent literature examining the importance of LMX differentiation (i.e. that leaders have differential relationships with followers; Yu, Matta, & Cornfield, 2018), PL behaviors may be differentially exhibited towards different followers, and this variability may be of significant…”