What do boards really do? Evidence from minutes of board meetings.
By Miriam Schwartz-Ziv, Michael S. Weisbach. 2013
307 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0e7840f3710e2a35a3db51a733ba4a6a05493d6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Is Disclosure an Effective Cleansing Mechanism? The Dynamics of Compensation Peer Benchmarking (2013, unknown): “Some boards of directors are more effective at monitoring (Faleye, Hoitash, and Hoitash 2011a), while others are good at advising management on strategic decisions (Schwartz-Ziv and Weisbach 2011; Faleye, Hoitash, and Hoitash 2011b; Coles, Daniel, and Naveen 2011). Faleye, Hoitash, and Hoitash (2011”
- Managerial conservatism, board independence and corporate innovation (2018, background): “in curtailing managerial pursuit of private benefits and encouraging efforts (e.g., Brickley and James, 1987; Duchin et al., 2010; Wintoki et al., 2012; Schwartz-Ziv and Weisbach, 2012; Knyazeva et al., 2013).”
- Female directors, board committees and firm performance (2018, unknown): “Schwartz-Ziv and Weisbach (2013) analyze minutes of board committee meetings of Israeli firms to examine the relative time devoted by the board to managerial and supervisory roles.”
- The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating role of board independence (2016, background): “In a recent important paper, Schwartz-Ziv and Weisbach (2013), using private data on detailedminutes of boardmeetings, suggest that boards spendmost of their timemonitoring management.”