On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview

By R. Fazio. 2001

932 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c0ba356ef9d4e3ad017a2d4d91ac96b6f41bfad4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (2006, background): “…differential treatments so that one group differs from the other only in attitudes (i.e., conditioned evaluation, cf. Baccus et al., 2004; Olson & Fazio, 2001, 2002; C. J. Mitchell et al., 2003) but no other systematic factor (as recently in Wänke, De Houwer, Plessner, Richter, & Gärtner,…”
The Automaticity of Affect for Political Leaders, Groups, and Issues: An Experimental Test of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis (2005, background): “…gift pain delightful painful mutilate death grief rabies horrible repulsive rainbow laughter hug rainbow toothache rape As noted earlier, manipulation of the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) allows us to assess the automaticity of response within the attitude-priming paradigm (Fazio, 1990, 2001).”
Modulation of automatic semantic priming by feature-specific attention allocation (2009, background): “Affective priming refers to the observation that affectively polarized targets are typically responded to faster after the presentation of affectively congruent primes as compared to affectively incongruent primes (for reviews, see Fazio, 2001; Musch & Klauer, 2003).”
Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes (2004, background): “Attitudes are accompanied by affective reactions, however (e.g., Cacioppo & Petty, 1979; Dijker, Kok, & Koomen, 1996; see also Olson & Fazio, 2001), and the psychological function of these reactions should be addressed.”
Ten Frequently Asked Questions About Implicit Measures and Their Frequently Supposed, But Not Entirely Correct Answers (2009, methodology): “, & Fazio, R. H. (2003). Relations between implicit measures”
TARGET ARTICLE: Attributions of Implicit Prejudice, or "Would Jesse Jackson 'Fail' the Implicit Association Test?" (2004, neutral): “Fazio, Sanbonmatsu, Powell, and Kardes (1986) reasoned that this priming technique could be extended to attitudes. For example, a prime might be a negatively valenced word such as murderer. If the subsequently presented target is evaluatively congruent, such as the word evil would be, the evaluation”
Elaboration and consequences of anchored estimates: An attitudinal perspective on numerical anchoring (2008, background): “For example, higher levels of elaboration could be associated with cognitive changes, such as increased accessibility of the attitude or judgment (Fazio, 2001), increased integration with relevant knowledge (Petty et al., 1995), or increased structural consistency of attitude-relevant knowledge…”
What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. (2006, background): “In brief, a priming stimulus such as generous can be expected to (1) activate affectively similar but otherwise semantically unrelated material in memory (as in automatic attitude or affective priming research; see Fazio, 2001; Ferguson & Bargh, 2004, for reviews); (2) impressions and trait judgme”
Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. (2011, background): “Experiment 3: Retroactive Priming I In recent years, priming experiments have become a staple of cognitive and cognitive social psychology (Bargh & Ferguson, 2000; Fazio, 2001; Klauer & Musch, 2003).”
Socio-demographics, implicit attitudes, explicit attitudes, and sustainable consumption in supermarket shopping (2016, background): “Once formed, these attitudes are stored in memory, revised if new relevant information becomes available (e.g. Fazio, 2007; Jacoby et al., 2002; Petty, 2006; Sanbonmatsu & Fazio, 1990), and used anytime they are activated (Fazio, 2001).”
Positive affect as implicit motivator: on the nonconscious operation of behavioral goals. (2005, background): “Results revealed a classic affective priming effect (see Fazio, 2001): Immediate access to positive words was facilitated and access to negative words was inhibited after the goal state (e.g., blue) was produced.”
The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgements of semantic coherence (2009, methodology): “To assess its valence the procedure of affective priming (Fazio, 2001) may be used, in which an evaluative adjective or noun is judged to be either ‘‘good’’ or ‘‘bad’’ after being preceded by an affect-laden prime word.”
Evidence for Rapid Affective Evaluation of Environmental Scenes (2002, background): “…framework of affective priming research, this result is suggested to indicate that the presentation of an environmental picture automatically activated an associated affective evaluation and, therefore, also affected the evaluation of the following target stimulus (cf. Fazio, 2001; Klauer, 1998).”
Understanding relationship quality: theoretical challenges and new tools for assessment (2010, background): “This produces a processing advantage for evaluatively congruent targets and a disadvantage for evaluatively incongruent targets, as the response suggested by the prime must be inhibited (for a review, see Fazio, 2001).”
What's in a Forename? Cue Familiarity and Stereotypical Thinking ☆ ☆☆ ★ (2002, methodology): “Through this demonstration, then, the present ings reaffirm the flexible nature of categorical thinking highlight the important role that associative strength name–gender association) may play in regulating the a sibility of categorical knowledge (Fazio, 2001).”