Microcontact Printing: Limitations and Achievements

442 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Technologies for Printing Sensors and Electronics Over Large Flexible Substrates: A Review (2015, methodology): “[2] have presented review on microcontact”
Engineering microscale topographies to control the cell–substrate interface (2012, background): “Its resolution can be less than 1 μm, limited primarily by loss of the mechanical integrity of the elastomer at smaller length scales [63].”
Stem Cell Organoid Engineering (2016, unknown): “This is done using a stamp often made up of poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS) using soft lithography techniques (Perl et al., 2009).”
Polymers in conventional and alternative lithography for the fabrication of nanostructures (2011, methodology): “Along with various approaches aimed at minimizing ink spreading, such as replacing liquid inks by polymers, methods were developed that avoid the use of inks completely and instead rely on a catalytic reaction between the stamp and substrate [162].”