Why IQ is not a covariate in cognitive studies of neurodevelopmental disorders
By M. Dennis, D. Francis, Paul T. Cirino, R. Schachar, Marcia Barnes, Jack M. Fletcher. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2009
901 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract IQ scores are volatile indices of global functional outcome, the final common path of an individual’s genes, biology, cognition, education, and experiences. In studying neurocognitive outcomes in children with neurodevelopmental disorders, it is commonly assumed that IQ can and should be partialed out of statistical relations or used as a covariate for specific measures of cognitive outcome. We propose that it is misguided and generally unjustified to attempt to control for IQ differences by matching procedures or, more commonly, by using IQ scores as covariates. We offer logical, statistical, and methodological arguments, with examples from three neurodevelopmental disorders (spina bifida meningomyelocele, learning disabilities, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) that: (1) a historical reification of general intelligence, g, as a causal construct that measures aptitude and potential rather than achievement and performance has fostered the idea that IQ has special status and that in studying neurocognitive function in neurodevelopmental disorders; (2) IQ does not meet the requirements for a covariate; and (3) using IQ as a matching variable or covariate has produced overcorrected, anomalous, and counterintuitive findings about neurocognitive function. (JINS, 2009, 15, 331–343.)
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c072d4ba9bb6e443c02c6020dadfc289e97352de
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- Neuropsychological measures of executive function and antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis (2011, neutral): “functions, including EF (Dennis et al. 2009).”
- A unitary executive function predicts intelligence in children (2012, background): “One of the pertinent questions in the literature relates to the distinctiveness of intelligence from EFs (Dennis et al., 2009).”